Showing preview only (4,094K chars total). Download the full file or copy to clipboard to get everything.
Repository: facebookresearch/Shepherd
Branch: main
Commit: 29b1863bbecd
Files: 9
Total size: 3.9 MB
Directory structure:
gitextract_9xyx2n90/
├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
├── CONTRIBUTING.md
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── data/
│ ├── human_data_for_model.jsonl
│ └── human_data_raw.jsonl
├── docs/
│ ├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
│ └── CONTRIBUTING.md
└── notebook/
└── process_human_data.ipynb
================================================
FILE CONTENTS
================================================
================================================
FILE: CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
================================================
# Code of Conduct
## Our Pledge
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
contributors and maintainers pledge to make participation in our project and
our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression,
level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal
appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
## Our Standards
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
include:
* Using welcoming and inclusive language
* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
* Focusing on what is best for the community
* Showing empathy towards other community members
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
advances
* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic
address, without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional setting
## Our Responsibilities
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or
permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate,
threatening, offensive, or harmful.
## Scope
This Code of Conduct applies within all project spaces, and it also applies when
an individual is representing the project or its community in public spaces.
Examples of representing a project or community include using an official
project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting
as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of
a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
This Code of Conduct also applies outside the project spaces when there is a
reasonable belief that an individual's behavior may have a negative impact on
the project or its community.
## Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported by contacting the project team at <opensource-conduct@fb.com>. All
complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that
is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good
faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other
members of the project's leadership.
## Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
================================================
FILE: CONTRIBUTING.md
================================================
# Contributing to Shepherd
We want to make contributing to this project as easy and transparent as
possible.
## Pull Requests
We actively welcome your pull requests.
1. Fork the repo and create your branch from `main`.
2. If you've added code that should be tested, add tests.
3. If you've changed APIs, update the documentation.
4. Ensure the test suite passes.
5. Make sure your code lints.
6. If you haven't already, complete the Contributor License Agreement ("CLA").
## Contributor License Agreement ("CLA")
In order to accept your pull request, we need you to submit a CLA. You only need
to do this once to work on any of Facebook's open source projects.
Complete your CLA here: <https://code.facebook.com/cla>
## Issues
We use GitHub issues to track public bugs. Please ensure your description is
clear and has sufficient instructions to be able to reproduce the issue.
Facebook has a [bounty program](https://www.facebook.com/whitehat/) for the safe
disclosure of security bugs. In those cases, please go through the process
outlined on that page and do not file a public issue.
## License
By contributing to Shepherd, you agree that your contributions will be licensed
under the LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
================================================
FILE: LICENSE
================================================
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
=======================================================================
Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and
does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of
Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or
other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related
information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no
warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their
terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons
disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the
fullest extent possible.
Using Creative Commons Public Licenses
Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and
conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share
original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright
and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The
following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not
exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.
Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are
intended for use by those authorized to give the public
permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by
copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are
irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms
and conditions of the license they choose before applying it.
Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before
applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the
material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any
material not subject to the license. This includes other CC-
licensed material, or material used under an exception or
limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors:
wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors
Considerations for the public: By using one of our public
licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the
licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If
the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for
example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to
copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our
licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain
other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of
the licensed material may still be restricted for other
reasons, including because others have copyright or other
rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests,
such as asking that all changes be marked or described.
Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to
respect those requests where reasonable. More_considerations
for the public:
wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees
=======================================================================
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public
License
By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree
to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public
License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a
contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your
acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You
such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from
making the Licensed Material available under these terms and
conditions.
Section 1 -- Definitions.
a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar
Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material
and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered,
arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring
permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the
Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed
Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording,
Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is
synched in timed relation with a moving image.
b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright
and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.
c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights
closely related to copyright including, without limitation,
performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database
Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or
categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights
specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar
Rights.
d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the
absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws
fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright
Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international
agreements.
e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or
any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights
that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.
f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database,
or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public
License.
g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the
terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to
all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the
Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.
h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights
under this Public License.
i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards
commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of
this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for
other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital
file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is
no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the
exchange.
j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or
process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such
as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution,
dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material
available to the public including in ways that members of the
public may access the material from a place and at a time
individually chosen by them.
k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright
resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases,
as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially
equivalent rights anywhere in the world.
l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights
under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.
Section 2 -- Scope.
a. License grant.
1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License,
the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free,
non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to
exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:
a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or
in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and
b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for
NonCommercial purposes only.
2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where
Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public
License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with
its terms and conditions.
3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section
6(a).
4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The
Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in
all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created,
and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The
Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or
authority to forbid You from making technical modifications
necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including
technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective
Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License,
simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a)
(4) never produces Adapted Material.
5. Downstream recipients.
a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every
recipient of the Licensed Material automatically
receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the
Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this
Public License.
b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose
any additional or different terms or conditions on, or
apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the
Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the
Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed
Material.
6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or
may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You
are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected
with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by,
the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as
provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).
b. Other rights.
1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not
licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity,
privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to
the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to
assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited
extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed
Rights, but not otherwise.
2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this
Public License.
3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to
collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed
Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society
under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory
licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly
reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when
the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial
purposes.
Section 3 -- License Conditions.
Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the
following conditions.
a. Attribution.
1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified
form), You must:
a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor
with the Licensed Material:
i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed
Material and any others designated to receive
attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by
the Licensor (including by pseudonym if
designated);
ii. a copyright notice;
iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;
iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of
warranties;
v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the
extent reasonably practicable;
b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and
retain an indication of any previous modifications; and
c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this
Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or
hyperlink to, this Public License.
2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any
reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in
which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be
reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or
hyperlink to a resource that includes the required
information.
3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the
information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent
reasonably practicable.
4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's
License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted
Material from complying with this Public License.
Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.
Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that
apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:
a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right
to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial
portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes
only;
b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database
contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database
Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database
Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and
c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share
all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.
For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not
replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed
Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.
Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.
a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE
EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS
AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF
ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS,
IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS,
ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT
KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT
ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE
TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES,
COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR
USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN
ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR
DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR
IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided
above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent
possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and
waiver of all liability.
Section 6 -- Term and Termination.
a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and
Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with
this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License
terminate automatically.
b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under
Section 6(a), it reinstates:
1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided
it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the
violation; or
2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.
For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any
right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations
of this Public License.
c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the
Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop
distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so
will not terminate this Public License.
d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public
License.
Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.
a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different
terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.
b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the
Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and
independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.
Section 8 -- Interpretation.
a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and
shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose
conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully
be made without permission under this Public License.
b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is
deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the
minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision
cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License
without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and
conditions.
c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no
failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the
Licensor.
d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted
as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities
that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal
processes of any jurisdiction or authority.
=======================================================================
Creative Commons is not a party to its public
licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of
its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances
will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons
public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public
Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that
material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as
otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at
creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the
use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo
of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including,
without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications
to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements,
understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For
the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the
public licenses.
Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.
================================================
FILE: README.md
================================================
# Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generation
Tianlu Wang*, Ping Yu*, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan<sup>+</sup>, Sean O'Brien, Ram Pasunuru, Jane Yu, Olga Golovneva, Luke Zettlemoyer, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Asli Celikyilmaz
#### TL;DR: We introduce Shepherd, a language model specifically tuned to critique model responses and suggest refinements, extending beyond the capabilities of an untuned model to identify diverse errors and provide suggestions to remedy them.
<img src="images/overview.png" alt="show" style="zoom:90%;" />
## Human annotated feedback
#### Number of prompts from each dataset
Datasets | Number of Prompts
--- | ---------------------------------
Entailment Bank | 11
Proofwriter | 162
GSM8K | 431
PIQA | 246
CosmosQA | 143
e-SNLI | 65
Adversarial NLI | 68
ECQA | 118
GPT-3 summarization | 26
DeFacto | 29
#### Error types for human data collection.
Our taxonomy breaks down errors into six specific categories. We require annotators, through our data collection interface, to pinpoint and select these error types accurately, coupled with a well-founded critique. This process allows us to gather data that holds potential for fine-grained training or in-depth evaluation.
Error Type | Description
--- | ---------------------------------
Arithmetic | Error in math calculations.
Coherence and deduction | Sentences that do not logically follow each other, a summary that lacks a clear topic or conclusion, no structure, steps contradict, etc. This also includes *Missing Step* that a step in a reasoning/explanation or thought process is missing (typically observed in math or logical reasoning problems).
Consistency with context | Information about an object (i.e., quantity, characteristics) or a personal named entity does not match information provided in the context/question.
Veracity | Information is not provided in the context and is irrelevant or wrong. For our annotation task rather than needing to look up, please just refer to the correct output which we assume to be the gold answer.
Redundancy | Explanation contains redundant information, which even though may be factual, is not required to answer the question and/or repeated in the output.
Commonsense | The output lacks relations that should be known from the general world. Should be instinctive, without questioning it, based on belief, and accepted by the society, e.g. all ducks are birds.
No error | The output is correct.
#### Download data
We inlcude the [raw data](./data) we collected through Moravia and the data we processed for model training. We also include the [data process script](./notebook) we used.
## License
The data is under [CC-BY-NC 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
## Citation
Please cite our paper if Shepherd contributes in your work:
```bibtex
@misc{wang2023shepherd,
title={Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generation},
author={Tianlu Wang and Ping Yu and Xiaoqing Ellen Tan and Sean O'Brien and Ramakanth Pasunuru and Jane Dwivedi-Yu and Olga Golovneva and Luke Zettlemoyer and Maryam Fazel-Zarandi and Asli Celikyilmaz},
year={2023},
eprint={2308.04592},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
```
================================================
FILE: data/human_data_for_model.jsonl
================================================
{"id": 0, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Jolene and Phil have four children, each with the same birthday. They gave birth to their first child exactly 15 years ago. They gave birth to their second child exactly one year after the birth of their first child. They gave birth to their third child on the fourth birthday of their second child. Two years after the birth of their third child, they gave birth to their fourth child. How old, in years, is their fourth child?", "answer": "The first child was born 15 years ago. The second child was born 1 year after the first child. The third child was born on the second child's fourth birthday. The fourth child was born 2 years after the third child. So the fourth child is 15 + 1 + 4 + 2 = 22 years old. The answer is 22.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, The math is off in the previous to last sentence, since the ages of the children should be subtracted, not summed. 15 - 1 - 4 -2 = 8 is the right answer. Secondly, \"So the fourth child is 15 + 1 + 4 + 2 = 22 years old. The answer is 22.\" The fourth born child cannot be older than the first born child. "}
{"id": 1, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Ryan has 40 balls. There are twice as many red balls as blue while the rest are green. If there are 11 blue balls, how many green balls are there?", "answer": "Ryan has 40 balls. There are twice as many red balls as blue. So there are 20 red balls. The rest are green. 40 - 20 - 11 = 19. The answer is 19.\n\n", "feedback": "Saying that there are twice as many red balls as blue doesn't tell us what the total of red balls is, so the deduction that there are 20 is wrongly based. From this wrong premise, the rest of the answer is wrong"}
{"id": 2, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "A family has three adults and children, both girls and boys. They went out for a family trip and prepared 3 dozen boiled eggs for the trip. Every adult got 3 eggs, and the boys each received 1 more egg than each girl since the girls had some snacks. How many boys went on the trip if the number of girls was 7 and each girl received an egg?", "answer": "There were 3 adults and children, both girls and boys. Each adult got 3 eggs. So 3 adults got 3 * 3 = 9 eggs. Each boy got 1 more egg than each girl. So 7 girls got 7 eggs. 7 + 7 = 14 eggs. So the boys got 9 + 14 = 23 eggs. 9 + 14 = 23. The answer is 23.\n\n", "feedback": "\"So the boys got 9 + 14 = 23 eggs.\" Where is the 9 coming from? the 14 is girls multiplied by 2 but the 9 has no context. "}
{"id": 3, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Hector purchased a container of gumballs. He gave 4 to Todd, then he gave twice as many as he had given Todd to Alisha, and then he gave 5 less than four times as many to Bobby as he had given to Alisha. If Hector had 6 gumballs remaining, what is the total number of gumballs that Hector purchased?", "answer": "Hector started with some number of gumballs. He gave 4 to Todd. Then he gave twice as many as he had given Todd to Alisha. So he gave 4 + 4 = 8 gumballs to Alisha. Then he gave 5 less than four times as many to Bobby as he had given to Alisha. So he gave 4 * 4 - 5 = 16 - 5 = 11 gumballs to Bobby. So he gave 4 + 8 + 11 = 23 gumballs away. He had 6 left. So he started with 6 + 23 = 29 gumballs. The answer is 29.\n\n", "feedback": "Bobby was given 5 gumballs less than four times what was given to Alisha. Alisha got 8 gumballs, so the right calculation would be 8 * 4 - 5, whereas the output says \"4 * 4 - 5\"."}
{"id": 4, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "At a gathering, it was reported that 26 people took wine, 22 people took soda, and 17 people took both drinks. If each person could have taken one or more drinks regardless of what was reported, how many people altogether were at the gathering?", "answer": "26 people took wine, 22 people took soda, and 17 people took both drinks. So 26 + 22 + 17 = 65 people were at the gathering. The answer is 65.\n\n", "feedback": "\"So 26 + 22 + 17 = 65 people were at the gathering.\" This ignores the context \"If each person could have taken one or more drinks regardless of what was reported\" and therefore is false."}
{"id": 5, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Baez has 25 marbles. She loses 20% of them one day. Then a friend sees her and gives her double the amount that Baez has after she lost them. How many marbles does Baez end up with?", "answer": "Baez started with 25 marbles. After losing 20%, she has 25 - 20% of 25 = 25 - 5 = 20 marbles. Her friend gives her double the amount that she has. So she has 20 + 20 = 40 marbles. The answer is 40.\n\n", "feedback": "\"So she has 20 + 20 = 40 marbles.\" The person forgot to add double the amount of marbles and ended up with the incorrect answer. The correct answer is 20 plus double the amount 40 equals 60 marbles. "}
{"id": 6, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "James buys 200 lotto tickets for 2 dollars each. Of those tickets 20% are winners. 80% of the winners are for 5 dollars. 1 ticket is the grand prize of $5,000. The other tickets win an average of $10. How much did he profit?", "answer": "James bought 200 tickets for 2 dollars each. So he spent 200 * 2 = 400 dollars. 20% of 200 is 40. 80% of 40 is 32. So 32 tickets won 5 dollars each. 1 ticket won 5,000 dollars. 40 - 32 - 1 = 7 tickets won 10 dollars each. 400 - 32 * 5 - 5000 - 7 * 10 = 100 dollars. The answer is 100 dollars.\n\n", "feedback": "In the calculation in the previous to last sentence, the operations are wrong, leading to the wrong result. It should have been -400 + 32*5 + 5000 + 7*10 = 4830"}
{"id": 7, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Mrs. Smith wanted to buy wears worth $500. She went to a boutique with the $500 but by the time she had picked out everything she liked, she realized that she would need two-fifths more money than she had. If the shop owner gave her a discount of 15%, how much more money will she still need?", "answer": "Mrs. Smith had $500. She needed two-fifths more. So she needed 500 + 2/5 * 500 = 500 + 200 = 700. She got a discount of 15%. So she needed 700 * 0.85 = 595. The answer is 595.\n\n", "feedback": "The final answer provided doesn't answer the question. She will need 595 but she has 500 already. So the answer to \"how much more money will she need\" is 595 - 500 = 95. The answer is incomplete. "}
{"id": 8, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Archibald eats 1 apple a day for two weeks. Over the next three weeks, he eats the same number of apples as the total of the first two weeks. Over the next two weeks, he eats 3 apples a day. Over these 7 weeks, how many apples does he average a week?", "answer": "Archibald ate 1 apple a day for 2 weeks. That is 2 * 7 = 14 apples. Then he ate the same number of apples as the first two weeks. So he ate 14 apples. Then he ate 3 apples a day for 2 weeks. That is 2 * 14 = 28 apples. So he ate 14 + 14 + 28 = 56 apples. 56 apples over 7 weeks is 56 / 7 = 8 apples a week. The answer is 8.\n\n", "feedback": "\"Then he ate 3 apples a day for 2 weeks. That is 2 * 14 = 28 apples.\" 3 apples a day is stated then there is 2 in the equation incorrectly making the rest of the math incorrect. "}
{"id": 9, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Tony has a terrible toothache and decides to buy some painkillers from the store. He picks up a bottle of 50 pills and takes them home. He takes 2 pills each day three times a day for the first 2 days, before cutting this amount in half for the next 3 days. On the sixth day, he takes a final 2 pills in the morning and ends up feeling better. How many pills are left in the bottle?", "answer": "Tony started with 50 pills. He took 2 pills each day for 2 days. 2 * 2 * 2 = 8 pills. He took 2 pills each day for 3 days. 2 * 2 * 3 = 12 pills. He took 2 pills on the sixth day. 8 + 12 + 2 = 22 pills. 50 - 22 = 28 pills. The answer is 28.\n\n", "feedback": "When saying that \"He took 2 pills each day for 2 days.\" they left out 3 times a day throwing off the math. "}
{"id": 10, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Herman likes to feed the birds in December, January and February. He feeds them 1/2 cup in the morning and 1/2 cup in the afternoon. How many cups of food will he need for all three months?", "answer": "Herman feeds the birds 1/2 cup in the morning and 1/2 cup in the afternoon. So he feeds them 1 cup each day. 1 cup * 3 months = 3 cups. The answer is 3 cups.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, \"So he feeds them 1 cup each day. 1 cup * 3 months = 3 cups\" They state one cup per day and then state one cup multiplied by 3 month is 3 cups. This does not factor in how many days in each month or complete the answer. Secondly, There is more than one day in a month. "}
{"id": 11, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "There is very little car traffic on Happy Street. During the week, most cars pass it on Tuesday - 25. On Monday, 20% less than on Tuesday, and on Wednesday, 2 more cars than on Monday. On Thursday and Friday, it is about 10 cars each day. On the weekend, traffic drops to 5 cars per day. How many cars travel down Happy Street from Monday through Sunday?", "answer": "On Monday, there are 20% less than on Tuesday. So 25 * 0.8 = 20. On Wednesday, there are 2 more cars than on Monday. So 20 + 2 = 22. On Thursday and Friday, there are 10 cars each day. So 10 + 10 = 20. On the weekend, there are 5 cars each day. So 5 + 5 = 10. So the total is 20 + 22 + 20 + 10 = 72. The answer is 72.\n\n", "feedback": "\"So the total is 20 + 22 + 20 + 10 = 72. \" They forgot the initial known amount of cars that pass on Tuesday (25) and did not add it to the total thus being 25 less than the correct answer. "}
{"id": 12, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Ralph is going to practice playing tennis with a tennis ball machine that shoots out tennis balls for Ralph to hit. He loads up the machine with 175 tennis balls to start with. Out of the first 100 balls, he manages to hit 2/5 of them. Of the next 75 tennis balls, he manages to hit 1/3 of them. Out of all the tennis balls, how many did Ralph not hit?", "answer": "Ralph started with 175 tennis balls. He hit 2/5 of the first 100. 2/5 of 100 is 40. So he hit 100 - 40 = 60 of the first 100. He hit 1/3 of the next 75. 1/3 of 75 is 25. So he hit 75 - 25 = 50 of the next 75. So he hit 60 + 50 = 110 of the 175 tennis balls. So he did not hit 175 - 110 = 65 tennis balls. The answer is 65.\n\n", "feedback": "\"He hit 2/5 of the first 100. 2/5 of 100 is 40. So he hit 100 - 40 = 60 of the first 100. \" He hit 40 not 60. The math is correct but the answer is wrong. \"He hit 1/3 of the next 75. 1/3 of 75 is 25. So he hit 75 - 25 = 50 of the next 75. \" Same issue, incorrect because the equation shows what was hit rather than what was not hit. This leads the total answer to the question ends up being balls hit instead of balls not hit. "}
{"id": 13, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Luna's monthly food budget is equal to 60% of her house rental budget while her phone bill budget is 10% of her food budget. If the total budget of house rental and food budget is $240, how much is Luna's total monthly budget to pay all those expenses?", "answer": "Luna's food budget is 60% of her house rental budget. So 60% of 240 is 144. Her food budget is 144. Her phone bill budget is 10% of her food budget. So 10% of 144 is 14.4. Her phone bill budget is 14.4. So her total budget is 144 + 14.4 = 158.4. The answer is 158.4.\n\n", "feedback": "\"So her total budget is 144 + 14.4 = 158.4. \" The total monthly budget cannot be less than the known budget of 240 for house rental and food. "}
{"id": 14, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "James and Ali together own $250. If you know that James owns $40 more than Ali, then calculate the amount owned by James.", "answer": "James and Ali together own $250. James owns $40 more than Ali. So James owns $40 + $40 = $80 more than Ali. So James owns $80 + $250 = $330. The answer is $330.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, The statement \"So James owns $40 + $40 = $80 more than Ali.\" doesn't make sense as it's not clear where the sum is coming from. The $80 is incorrect and so the whole result is incorrect. Secondly, \"The answer is $330.\" The total amount is stated as 250 so the answer cannot be higher than the stated total amount. "}
{"id": 15, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Fern is checking IDs to get into an R-rated movie. She denied 20% of the 120 kids from Riverside High, 70% of the 90 kids from West Side High, and half the 50 kids from Mountaintop High. How many kids got into the movie?", "answer": "Fern denied 20% of 120 kids from Riverside High. 20% of 120 is 24. She denied 70% of 90 kids from West Side High. 70% of 90 is 63. She denied half of 50 kids from Mountaintop High. Half of 50 is 25. So she denied 24 + 63 + 25 = 112 kids. 120 - 112 = 8. 90 - 63 = 27. 50 - 25 = 25. So 8 + 27 + 25 = 50 kids got into the movie. The answer is 50.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer preforms a wrong step by subtracting 112 from the kids from Riverside High instead of subtracting it from the total amount of kids. There were 120+90+50=260 total kids, so 260-112=148 kids got in."}
{"id": 16, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Fern is checking IDs to get into an R-rated movie. She denied 20% of the 120 kids from Riverside High, 70% of the 90 kids from West Side High, and half the 50 kids from Mountaintop High. How many kids got into the movie?", "answer": "Fern denied 20% of 120 kids from Riverside High. 20% of 120 is 24. She denied 70% of 90 kids from West Side High. 70% of 90 is 63. She denied half of 50 kids from Mountaintop High. Half of 50 is 25. So she denied 24 + 63 + 25 = 112 kids. 120 - 112 = 8. 90 - 63 = 27. 50 - 25 = 25. So 8 + 27 + 25 = 50 kids got into the movie. The answer is 50.\n\n", "feedback": "\"120 - 112 = 8. 90 - 63 = 27. 50 - 25 = 25. So 8 + 27 + 25 = 50 kids got into the movie. The answer is 50.\" There's no explanation of where these numbers came from and the final answer is incorrect. The arrived total of 112 should be subtracted from the total number of kids in order to find the correct answer."}
{"id": 17, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "A roadwork company is paving a newly constructed 16-mile road. They use a mixture of pitch and gravel to make the asphalt to pave the road. Each truckloads of asphalt uses two bags of gravel and five times as many bags of gravel as it does barrels of pitch to make. It takes three truckloads of asphalt to pave each mile of road. The company paved 4 miles of road on one day, then one mile less than double that on the second day. How many barrels of pitch will the company need to finish the remaining road on the third day?", "answer": "The company paved 4 miles on the first day. On the second day, they paved 4 + 2 = 6 miles. So they paved 10 miles in total. The remaining road is 16 - 10 = 6 miles. Each truckload of asphalt uses 2 bags of gravel and 5 times as many bags of gravel as it does barrels of pitch. So each truckload uses 2 + 5 * x = 7 bags of gravel and x barrels of pitch. Each mile of road uses 3 truckloads of asphalt. So each mile of road uses 3 * 7 = 21 bags of gravel and 3 * x = 3x barrels of pitch. The company paved 10 miles of road. So they used 10 * 21 = 210 bags of gravel and 10 * 3x = 30x barrels of pitch. The remaining road is 6 miles. So they will need 6 * 21 = 126 bags of gravel and 6 * 3x = 18x barrels of pitch. The company used 30x barrels of pitch. So they will need 18x - 30x = -12x barrels of pitch. The answer is -12x.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, Saying that \"each truckload uses 2 + 5 * x = 7 bags of gravel\" is wrong - each truckload needs 2 bags of gravel, it's not clear where that 7 is coming from. The rest of the calculation is based on this and so it's wrong. Aside form 2 bags of gravel, each truckload uses 2/5 barrels of pitch. they paved 11 miles in total, 16-11=5 miles are remaining, and it takes 3 truckloads to pave one mile. 5*3=11 truckloads will be needed.\n15*2 = 30 bags of gravel\n15*2/5=6 bags of pitch will be needed. Secondly, The answer is -12x. -12x is not a number of barrels of pitch. "}
{"id": 18, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Manex is a tour bus driver. He has to drive 55 miles to the destination and drive going back to the starting point on a different way that is 10 miles farther. If he can drive 1 mile for 2 minutes and stayed 2 hours at the destination, how long will it take the bus driver to do the entire tour in hours?", "answer": "Manex has to drive 55 miles to the destination. Then he has to drive 10 miles farther to get back to the starting point. So he has to drive 55 + 10 = 65 miles. He can drive 1 mile for 2 minutes. So he can drive 65 miles in 65 * 2 = 130 minutes. 130 minutes is 2 hours and 10 minutes. The answer is 2 hours and 10 minutes.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer is missing information when determining how long the tour will take the bus driver to do. The context gives the total mileage for a round trip 55 mi. one way + 65mi. on the way back which totals 120 miles. The answer only calculates the mileage for the trip there which means the total time it takes is also incorrect as it should have amounted to a total of 6 hours for the whole tour instead of 2 hrs. 10 min. Secondly, The total mileage being driven was calculated wrong in the answer. The context says it's 120 miles round trip and the answer says only 65 mi. because they didn't factor in the return trip mileage."}
{"id": 19, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Village Foods sells good food at a fair price. Their specialty is fresh vegetables. If they get 500 customers per month, and each customer purchases 2 heads of lettuce for $1 each and 4 tomatoes for $0.5 apiece, then how much money, in dollars, will the store receive in sales of lettuce and tomatoes per month?", "answer": "Village Foods gets 500 customers per month. Each customer buys 2 heads of lettuce for $1 each and 4 tomatoes for $0.5 apiece. So each customer spends 2 + 4 * 0.5 = 3.5 dollars. 500 customers spend 500 * 3.5 = 1750 dollars. The answer is 1750.\n\n", "feedback": "2 + 4 * 0.5 does not equal 3.5 dollars, it's 4. The calculations coming from these are wrong. "}
{"id": 20, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Gary bought his first used car for $6,000. Gary borrowed the money from his dad who said he could pay him back the full amount over 5 years. Gary decided he would pay his dad back the full amount in 2 years. How much more is Gary spending per month to pay the loan off in 2 years instead of 5?", "answer": "Gary borrowed $6,000. He will pay it back in 2 years. So he will pay $6,000 / 2 = $3,000 per year. He will pay it back in 5 years. So he will pay $6,000 / 5 = $1,200 per year. $3,000 - $1,200 = $1,800. The answer is $1,800.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer provided is the amount of extra money that would be paid per year, while the questions asks for the extra amount per month. 1,800 should be divided by 12 to get to the real answer, which is 150."}
{"id": 21, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "John works a job that offers performance bonuses. He makes $80 a day and works for 8 hours. He has the option of working hard to earn the performance bonus of an extra $20 a day, but the extra effort results in a 2-hour longer workday. How much does John make per hour if he decides to earn the bonus?", "answer": "John makes $80 a day. If he works for 8 hours, he makes $80 / 8 = $10 per hour. If he works for 10 hours, he makes $80 / 10 = $8 per hour. The bonus is $20, so he makes $10 + $20 = $30 per hour. The answer is $30.\n\n", "feedback": "\"The bonus is $20, so he makes $10 + $20 = $30 per hour. The answer is $30.\" The bonus is per day not per hour and thus is incorrect. John makes the same per hour with an 8 or 10 hour day at 10 per hour, which is $10."}
{"id": 22, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Loraine makes wax sculptures of animals. Large animals take four sticks of wax and small animals take two sticks. She made three times as many small animals as large animals, and she used 12 sticks of wax for small animals. How many sticks of wax did Loraine use to make all the animals?", "answer": "Loraine made 3 times as many small animals as large animals. So she made 3 small animals for every 1 large animal. 3 small animals take 6 sticks of wax. 1 large animal takes 4 sticks of wax. So 3 small animals + 1 large animal take 6 + 4 = 10 sticks of wax. Since she used 12 sticks of wax for small animals, she used 12 * 3 = 36 sticks of wax for large animals. So she used 10 + 36 = 46 sticks of wax. The answer is 46.\n\n", "feedback": "The calculations done make no sense and it's not clear where they are coming from. If Loraine used 12 sticks to make small animals, that means she made 12/2=6 small animals. She did three times as many small animals as she did large, which means she did 6/3=2 large animals. Large animales take 4 sticks each, so she used 2*4=8 sticks for large animals. 12+8=20 total sticks were used in total."}
{"id": 23, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Tommy is making 12 loaves of bread. He needs 4 pounds of flour per loaf. A 10-pound bag of flour costs $10 and a 12-pound bag costs $13. When he is done making his bread, he has no use for flour and so he will throw away whatever is left. How much does he spend on flour if he buys the cheapest flour to get enough?", "answer": "Tommy needs 4 pounds of flour per loaf. So he needs 12 * 4 = 48 pounds of flour. He can buy 10 pounds for $10. He can buy 12 pounds for $13. He can buy 10 pounds for $10 and 2 pounds for $2. So he can buy 12 pounds for $12. The answer is $12.\n\n", "feedback": "It's stated that \"2 pounds for $2\" but it's not possible to divide the bags so this is wrong. He can buy 50 pounds for $50 or he can buy 48 pounds for $52. So he spends $50 on flour."}
{"id": 24, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Hash has nine more than half as many toys as Bill has. If Bill has 60 toys, how many total toys do the boys have?", "answer": "Bill has 60 toys. Hash has 9 more than half as many toys as Bill. So Hash has 60 + 9 = 69 toys. The total is 60 + 69 = 129. The answer is 129.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer skipped a (9 more than half) step which meant the 60 toys were supposed to be halved before adding 9. The correct calculation would be 60/2 + 9 = 39. Bill's 60 toys plus Hash' 39 toys equals 99 toys between both boys."}
{"id": 25, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Chang's Garden has two kinds of apples. Sweet ones and sour ones. He can sell the sweet ones for $.5 an apple. The sour ones sell for $.1 an apple. 75% of the apples he gets are sweet and the rest are sour. If he earns $40, how many apples did his trees give him?", "answer": "Chang's Garden has 75% sweet apples and 25% sour apples. 75% of 40 is 30. 25% of 40 is 10. So he has 30 sweet apples and 10 sour apples. The answer is 40.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer used the price earned $40 as the number of apples gotten"}
{"id": 26, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Nurse Missy is attending to the needs of 12 patients in her hospital ward. Most of her patients require standard care, but one-third of her patients have special dietary requirements, which increases the serving time by 20%. At dinner time, she brings each patient their meal. It takes 5 minutes to serve each standard care patient. How long does it take, in minutes, for Missy to serve dinner to all of her patients?", "answer": "There are 12 patients. 12 / 3 = 4. So 4 patients have special dietary requirements. 4 * 5 = 20 minutes. 8 patients have standard care. 8 * 5 = 40 minutes. 20 + 40 = 60 minutes. The answer is 60 minutes.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer multiplied 4 patients by 5 minutes instead of multiplying the 4 patients by 6 minutes each. The correct calculation would be 4*6=24. 24+40=64 so the total time needed is 64 minutes."}
{"id": 27, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Jerry\u2019s two daughters play softball on different teams. They each have 8 games this season. Each team practices 4 hours for every game they play. If each game lasts for 2 hours, how many hours will Jerry spend at the field watching his daughters play and practice altogether?", "answer": "Jerry\u2019s two daughters each have 8 games. Each game lasts 2 hours. So they will spend 8 * 2 = 16 hours playing. Each team practices 4 hours for every game they play. So they will spend 8 * 4 = 32 hours practicing. 16 + 32 = 48 hours. The answer is 48 hours.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer calculated the hours for one daughter, and forgot to multiply the result by 2."}
{"id": 28, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Carl has a jar full of marbles. He takes out 12 marbles to play a game with, but he accidentally drops them and 1/2 the marbles get lost. So Carl takes out 10 more marbles. While he is playing his game his mother comes home with another bag of marbles for him, which has 25 marbles in it. If Carl can't find his lost marbles, then how many marbles is he going to put in the jar after he plays his game, from both his original marbles and the new ones?", "answer": "Carl started with some marbles. He took out 12. Then he took out 10 more. So he took out 12 + 10 = 22 marbles. He lost 1/2 of them, so he lost 22 / 2 = 11 marbles. He has 25 new marbles. So he has 25 + 11 = 36 marbles. The answer is 36.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer calculated the lost marbles in the wrong step"}
{"id": 29, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Sonja makes her own peanut butter with peanuts and oil in a blender. She uses a ratio of two ounces of oil to smooth out every eight ounces of peanuts. Her last batch of peanut butter weighed 20 ounces. How many ounces of oil did she use?", "answer": "Sonja uses a ratio of 2 ounces of oil to 8 ounces of peanuts. So for 20 ounces of peanuts, she will use 20 / 8 = 2.5 ounces of oil. The answer is 2.5.\n\n", "feedback": "The ratio method used for calculation is wrong even if the instruction was to calculate \"20 ounces of peanut\" .. It should be 20/10 = 2 times her ratio and thus 2*2=4 ounces of oil, but instead it calculates 20/8=2.5"}
{"id": 30, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Sam and Jeff had a skipping competition at recess. The competition was split into four rounds. Sam completed 1 more skip than Jeff in the first round. Jeff skipped 3 fewer times than Sam in the second round. Jeff skipped 4 more times than Sam in the third round. Jeff got tired and only completed half the number of skips as Sam in the last round. If Sam skipped 16 times in each round, what is the average number of skips per round completed by Jeff?", "answer": "Sam skipped 16 times in each round. In the first round, Jeff skipped 1 less than Sam. So Jeff skipped 15 times. In the second round, Jeff skipped 3 fewer times than Sam. So Jeff skipped 13 times. In the third round, Jeff skipped 4 more times than Sam. So Jeff skipped 20 times. In the last round, Jeff skipped half the number of skips as Sam. So Jeff skipped 8 times. The average number of skips per round is (15 + 13 + 20 + 8) / 4 = 13. The answer is 13.\n\n", "feedback": "Operation in the last step is incorrect. (15 + 13 + 20 + 8) = 56/4 = 14 not 13."}
{"id": 31, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Brennan was researching his school project and had to download files from the internet to his computer to use for reference. After downloading 800 files, he deleted 70% of them because they were not helpful. He downloaded 400 more files but again realized that 3/5 of them were irrelevant. How many valuable files was he left with after deleting the unrelated files he downloaded in the second round?", "answer": "Brennan downloaded 800 files. He deleted 70% of them. 70% of 800 is 560. So he had 800 - 560 = 240 files left. He downloaded 400 more files. He deleted 3/5 of them. 3/5 of 400 is 240. So he had 240 + 240 = 480 files left. The answer is 480.\n\n", "feedback": "Missing steps when determining number of useful and non-useful files. The total number of valuable files downloaded in the 2nd round is not calculated: 400-240=160"}
{"id": 32, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Frank has 7 one-dollar bills, 4 five-dollar bills, 2 ten-dollar bills, and 1 twenty-dollar bill. He goes to buy peanuts, which cost $3 a pound. He buys what he wants and has $4 in change. He plans to eat the peanuts all in one week. How many pounds does he eat on average per day?", "answer": "Frank has 7 one-dollar bills, 4 five-dollar bills, 2 ten-dollar bills, and 1 twenty-dollar bill. He buys peanuts for $3 a pound. He has $4 in change. So he spent 7 + 4 = 11 dollars. He has 4 five-dollar bills, 2 ten-dollar bills, and 1 twenty-dollar bill left. 4 + 2 + 1 = 7. He spent 11 dollars and has 7 dollars left. So he spent 11 - 7 = 4 dollars. He bought 4 pounds of peanuts. He plans to eat the peanuts all in one week. So he eats 4 pounds in 7 days. 4 / 7 = 0.57. The answer is 0.57 pounds.\n\n", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer does not follow the context logically and it doesn't explain where the sentence \"He bought 4 pounds of peanuts.\" comes from. Secondly, The answer does not calculate how much money Frank has by adding up all the one, five, and ten dollar bills. It's unclear where the answer determines that Frank spent $7. It should be that Frank spent $63. "}
{"id": 33, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Gail has two fish tanks. The first tank is twice the size of the second tank. There are 48 gallons of water in the first tank. She follows the rule of one gallon of water per inch of fish. If she keeps two-inch fish in the second tank and three-inch fish in the first tank, how many more fish would Gail have in the first tank than the second tank if one of the first tank fish eats another?", "answer": "The first tank is twice the size of the second tank. So the first tank is 2 * 2 = 4 times the size of the second tank. If the first tank has 48 gallons of water, then the second tank has 48 / 4 = 12 gallons of water. If the second tank has 12 gallons of water, then it can hold 12 inches of fish. If the first tank has 48 gallons of water, then it can hold 48 inches of fish. If the second tank has 2-inch fish, then it can hold 12 / 2 = 6 fish. If the first tank has 3-inch fish, then it can hold 48 / 3 = 16 fish. So the first tank has 16 - 6 = 10 more fish than the second tank. The answer is 10.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer contradicts itself from 1st to 2nd sentences. The first tank is twice the size of second tank, not 4 times the size. \nThe answer states \"if the second tank has 12 gallons of water, then it can hold 12 inches of fish.\" This is illogical and it's unclear how this conclusion was reached.\nThe second tank holds 48/2=24 gallons of water.\nThe first tank holds 48/3=16 fish and the second one 24/2=12 fish. One of the first tank fish eats another, so that's 15 alive fish in the first tank. 15-12=3 there are three more fish in the first tank."}
{"id": 34, "dataset": "GSM8K", "question": "Cappuccinos cost $2, iced teas cost $3, cafe lattes cost $1.5 and espressos cost $1 each. Sandy orders some drinks for herself and some friends. She orders three cappuccinos, two iced teas, two cafe lattes, and two espressos. How much change does she receive back for a twenty-dollar bill?", "answer": "Sandy ordered 3 cappuccinos for 2 dollars each, 2 iced teas for 3 dollars each, 2 cafe lattes for 1.5 dollars each, and 2 espressos for 1 dollar each. So she spent 3 * 2 + 2 * 3 + 2 * 1.5 + 2 * 1 = 18 dollars. She paid with a 20 dollar bill. So she got 20 - 18 = 2 dollars back. The answer is 2 dollars.\n\n", "feedback": "The answer erroneously calculates that \"3 * 2 + 2 * 3 + 2 * 1.5 + 2 * 1\" equals to 18, which is untrue. The calculation of what Sandy spent should equal to $17 and not $18."}
{"id": 35, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nStan's Hat<br>Stan wore his blue beanie outside. His friend took the hat off of his head. Stan chased his friend through a field. His friend got away from Stan. The next day his friend came over wearing Stan's hat.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe next day, the friend came over wearing a blue hat.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes, the hypothesis is implied by the premise.\nHere is a line-by-line reasoning:\n\nStan's Hat<br>Stan wore his blue beanie outside. His friend took the hat off of his head. Stan chased his friend through a field. His friend got away from Stan. The next day his friend came over wearing Stan's hat.\n\nStan's friend took Stan's hat and did not return it until the next day. \nTherefore, the next day, Stan's friend will be seen wearing Stan's hat.", "feedback": "The answer concludes that Stan's friend is wearing Stan's hat but we don't know if the hat is the same hat that the friend stole from Sam yesterday."}
{"id": 36, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nRafael Dumas (born 13 March 1995) is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays as a defender for Paysandu, on loan from Brazilian S\u00e9rie A club Flamengo. He previously had a six-month loan spell at FC Goa in the Indian Super League in 2016 and at Global.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nDumas lived in Brazil for six months before moving to India.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe premise states that Dumas had a six-month loan spell at FC Goa in the Indian Super League, but it doesn't state where he was before going on loan nor what he did during his loan period. He could have been in Brazil the entire time, or somewhere else entirely.\nIt's possible that the author of the text intended for the reader to infer that Dumas was in Brazil prior to his loan period, but inference is not the same thing as implication. For something to be implied, it must logically follow from the information provided; if it isn't necessarily true given the information provided, then it is not implied.", "feedback": "The answer focuses on the difference between inference and implication, when common sense tells us that he must have spent at least 6 months in Brazil before he was loaned to India in 2016, because he was born there in 1995. The answer is unnecessarily complicated."}
{"id": 37, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nPLEASANT ISLAND, AK--Whale watchers in Alaska got the surprise of a lifetime recently. They were patiently waiting to see humpbacks off the coast of Pleasant Island when all of a sudden a huge whale surprises them. The humpback whale leaped out of the water and nearly made itself at home in the boat. Laughter broke out among the startled boaters. Despite getting drenched in water, the whale watchers were happy to get the surprise of a lifetime.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nthe whale watchers were not ready for it\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes, the premise implies the hypothesis.\nThe reason being that if they were ready for it, then they wouldn't have been startled by it, which contradicts the fact that they were startled by it.", "feedback": "The answer is correct until the last part when it states \"which contradicts the fact that they were startled by it\". This makes no sense as the answer was just given that they were startled because they didn't anticipate the actions by the whale"}
{"id": 38, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nHow to operate a roomba<br>Charge the roomba overnight. To charge your roomba, you need to dock it with the home base. Press the \" dock \" button on the top of the roomba or on your remote.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\no charge your roomba, you need to dock it with the home base. Press the \" dock \" button on the top of the roomba or on your tv remote.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, that makes sense. If you charge your Roomba by docking it with the home base, then to charge your Roomba you need to dock it with the home base.\nHowever, the hypothesis doesn't say anything about how to operate a Roomba - it only talks about charging it. It might be possible to operate it without docking it, e.g. by using the remote control.\nSo while the hypothesis is implied by the premise, the premise contains additional information.", "feedback": "After failing to make the distinction between the product remote and the tv remote, the answer provides unnecessary and extraneous information, which has nothing to do with the context or premise; i.e. how to operate a Roomba"}
{"id": 39, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nI'd like to come back to the question of nation building, but let me address the question directly, first. Fine. We did, actually, send troops into Rwanda to help with the humanitarian relief measures. My wife Tipper, who is here, actually went on a military plane with General Sholicatchvieli on one of those flights.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nTipper contains a t\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No.\nThe premise only states that they sent troops into Rwanda and that Tipper Gore accompanied one such mission. It does not state nor imply that Tipper actually interacted with any locals or learned any of their languages while she was there. As such, the hypothesis that she knows Swahili because of this trip cannot be deduced from the given information.", "feedback": "The answer ignores the fact that anyone would know that the name Tipper contains the letter 't', even if it has very little to do with the context itself. The right answer is yes."}
{"id": 40, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nPatrick Huston has represented Great Britain at the Olympics, set world records and broken into the world's top 20 in archery. Now the 21-year-old from Belfast aims to win a medal at the World Championships which take place in Mexico City, 15-22 October.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nPatrick Huston has a q\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, it implies it.\nIf Patrick Huston hasn't achieved a world record or broken into the top 20 without having a q, then him doing those things means he must have had a q.\nBut this isn't very interesting - you could say anything is implied by any other thing if you allow enough additional assumptions. What we really want to know is whether the premise entails the hypothesis.\nDoes the premise entail the hypothesis?\nNo, it doesn't.\nIt might turn out that Patrick Huston got where he is due to some combination of hard work, natural talent, luck, political connections, etc., none of which necessarily involve possessing a q. ", "feedback": "The answer ignores or fully misunderstands the hypothesis, which only concerns the question of whether or not the name Patrick Huston contains the letter 'q' or not. Instead, it provides a lengthy, irrelevant answer. It also poses irrelevant questions as part of its answer."}
{"id": 41, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nWhat are we going to tell our children? I'm a grandfather now. I want to be able to tell my grandson when I'm in my later years that I didn't turn away from the evidence that showed that we were doing some serious harm. In my faith tradition, it is -- it's written in the book of Matthew, \"Where your heart is, there is your treasure also.\"\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\n \"Where your heart is, there is your treasure also\" is a very old quote.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe speaker could hold the same values without believing that the quote is very old. For example, he could believe that the quote originated with his grandfather, who died recently. Or he could believe that the quote is recent but still value it as a guide to life.", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer appears to misunderstand the hypothesis by assuming that the grandfather has to believe the quote is very old, when that is, in fact, irrelevant. The only question is whether factually the quote is very old and it is. Secondly, Any person would know that a quote from one of the world's oldest stories/books would be considered 'very old'."}
{"id": 42, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nKota Ramakrishna Karanth (born May 1, 1894) was an Indian lawyer and politician who served as the Minister of Land Revenue for the Madras Presidency from March 1, 1946 to March 23, 1947. He was the elder brother of noted Kannada novelist K. Shivarama Karanth.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nKaod Ramakrishna has a younger brother.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The given statement is a fact which talks about the profession of Kota Ramakrishna Karanth and his position held in Madras Presidency government till date 23rd March 1947. From this statement alone it cannot be inferred that he had a younger brother as there is no information provided regarding his family background or any other person related to him. Hence, the given statement does not imply the given hypothesis.", "feedback": "The answer is factually wrong when it states the context did not provide information regarding his family background or any other person related him. The last sentence of the context clearly states he was the eldest brother of a novelist, thus providing information on a person related to him."}
{"id": 43, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where would you expect to see a white fox?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: great outdoors\nOption 2: open meadow\nOption 3: forest\nOption 4: arctic tundra\nOption 5: mountains\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "A white fox can be found in any environment that is cold enough for it to survive. It has thick fur which keeps it warm and camouflages it from predators (its main prey are lemmings). In some environments its coat takes on a blue-ish tinge due to a trick of light caused by the density of the fur.\nThe Arctic tundra is the coldest biome on Earth so it seems like an obvious choice but you can also find them in alpine regions such as mountains ranges and even deserts as long as there is snow on the ground.", "feedback": "The answer gives the correct answer when it states the most obvious choice to the option is the arctic tundra, and it appears that the answer alpine regions and mountain ranges makes sense too, but stating that they can be found in deserts as long as there is snow on the ground appears to be incorrect."}
{"id": 44, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "If you wanted to put a lamp in an area of the room where the walls meet, where would you put it?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: office\nOption 2: corner\nOption 3: desktop\nOption 4: corner of garden\nOption 5: bedroom\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If I wanted to put a lamp in an area where the walls meet, I would place it on a desk or table so that it illuminates the desired area without taking up valuable wall space. I wouldn't want to place it on the floor because lamps placed on the floor can get knocked over easily.", "feedback": "The The answer does not explain why options 1,2, 4 or 5 are not reasonable. It also adds additional information about floor which is not an option. Does not pick the correct answer of option 2: corner which is where the walls of a room meet."}
{"id": 45, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where on the planet would you expect a bald eagle to live?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: colorado\nOption 2: outside\nOption 3: protection\nOption 4: zoo exhibit\nOption 5: world\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Bald eagles are found throughout most of North America, from Alaska and Canada south to Mexico. They are also found in some parts of Europe and Asia. In the United States, bald eagles are usually seen near large bodies of water where they hunt for fish. They build their nests high up in tall trees near rivers, lakes, marshes, and coastal areas. Because of hunting and loss of habitat, bald eagle populations declined dramatically during the twentieth century. Conservation efforts have helped increase their numbers, and they were removed from the U.S. Endangered Species List in 2007. ", "feedback": "The answer adds extra information, last 2 sentences are unnecessary. It does not state which options specifically are where bald eagles might live, like outside, Colorado, Zoo Exhibit, and World. "}
{"id": 46, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "He looked down from the observation deck on the 75th storey, it was quite the view from the top of the what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: tall building\nOption 2: book of stories\nOption 3: skyscaper\nOption 4: apartment building\nOption 5: mall\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "An observation deck is generally found on a tall building such as a skyscraper or tower. So, option 3: skyscaper is the correct answer.\nThe word \"skyscraper\" was first used in the late 1800s to describe buildings with steel frames and stone exteriors that were taller than traditional brick buildings. Today, it refers to any very tall building.", "feedback": "The answer isn't wrong but it offers two of the options given in the premise and doesn't specify which one should be the correct one, skyscraper or tall building. The right answer is tall building."}
{"id": 47, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "A shelf would fit in what part of a room?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: garage\nOption 2: cupboard\nOption 3: refrigerator\nOption 4: corner\nOption 5: wall\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "A shelf can be placed in any of the options provided. However, a shelf is usually fixed to a wall and so option 5 is the best choice. You could also put a shelf in a corner (option 4), but it might look strange if you put one in a garage (option 1), cupboard (option 2) or refrigerator (option 3).", "feedback": "The answer states that a shelf can be fixed in \"any\" of the options provided but that is wrong because a shelf cannot be fixed in a refrigerator, cupboard or wall"}
{"id": 48, "dataset": "ESNLI", "question": "Here is a premise:\nA golfer takes a swing at a golf course while a crowd of onlookers watches.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nA gulfer is taking shots at the bar\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The given premise talks about a golfer taking a swing at a golf course while a crowd watches. This implies that there is a game being played which requires hitting balls with sticks at a target. Therefore, the person is probably playing golf. However, the hypothesis states that a gulfer is taking shots at the bar. While golfers do sometimes go to bars after playing a round, this isn't necessarily the case, and there are many people who go to bars who aren't golfers. As such, the premise doesn't imply the hypothesis.", "feedback": "The answer arrives at the correct answer but from the wrong premise: the issue is not that golfers don't necessarily go to a bar after playing, the issue is that they can't do both things (play and be at a bar) at the same time."}
{"id": 49, "dataset": "ESNLI", "question": "Here is a premise:\nA woman in a white dress and colorful hat is dancing and singing on stage in front of a band.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe woman in the white drees and hat was dancing and singing on stage\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe woman may have been dancing and singing on stage in front of a band at some point, but she might not be doing so anymore. The premise only describes a situation at a specific moment, while the hypothesis talks about an action over a period of time (she was dancing and singing).\nFor example, if I say:\n\n\u201cI\u2019m eating an apple.\u201d\n\nIt implies that I am currently eating an apple, but it doesn\u2019t mean that I will continue eating apples forever.", "feedback": "The answer says that the premise describes a situation of a specific moment, while the hypothesis talks about an action over a period of time. However, they both describe the same thing, only one of them is in the past tense and contains less detailed information. The hypothesis is correct because it basically paraphrases the premise, and a colorful hat is also a hat."}
{"id": 50, "dataset": "ESNLI", "question": "Here is a premise:\nA black and white dog sliding down a slope on a beach.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nA dog going uphill to the beach.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the hypothesis does not follow from the premise. The dog could have been sliding down any slope, not just a sandy beach.", "feedback": "It's common sense that a dog can't go down a slope and up a hill at the same time."}
{"id": 51, "dataset": "ESNLI", "question": "Here is a premise:\nTwo people on a motorized scooter in the pouring rain.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nPeople getting wet.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, it implies that at least one of them will get wet (if they don't have umbrellas). But it doesn't say anything about how much they will get wet - just riding in the rain will not soak you to the bone if you ride fast enough. Also, there might be some water splashing from the wheels, which would also contribute to getting wet.\nAll in all, the premise does imply the hypothesis, but only partially.", "feedback": "if they are riding in the pouring rain, they are bound to get wet. It can be reasonably concluded that the hypothesis is correct given the information in the context. The answer says that \"riding in the rain will not soak you to the bone if you ride fast enough\", which is untrue and a flaw in common sense"}
{"id": 52, "dataset": "ESNLI", "question": "Here is a premise:\nA dog turns on the grass to persue a flying ball.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe dog is outside\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe reason is that there could be grass inside a house (e.g., if you have potted plants), and the dog can turn on such grass while fetching a ball. \nNote that the hypothesis cannot be proved from the premise either: it is possible that the dog always fetches balls outside, but we haven't seen him do it enough times to conclude this.", "feedback": "Firstly, Even though the answer's output is correct about grass sometimes being inside it is not very likely that grass kept inside a house would have a large enough surface area for a dog. It also doesn't seem to factor in the low probability that a dog would pursue a flying ball in a person's home. Secondly, Even without having seen the dog, it is common knowledge that most people don't play fetch with their dogs indoors."}
{"id": 53, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Charlie is not furry. Charlie is smart. Charlie is not white. Charlie is not young. Dave is not white. Fiona is rough. Harry is not furry. All smart things are not cold. If Fiona is rough then Fiona is young. All furry, white things are smart. Young things are furry. Furry, young things are white. If something is young and kind then it is rough.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Fiona is furry.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\nIf Fiona is furry then she is white (from the premise All furry, white things are smart) and she is young (from the premise Young things are furry). But Fiona is not white and she is not young. So the hypothesis is not correct.", "feedback": "The answer ignores the context that Fiona is rough, therefore if Fiona is rough, Fiona is young. Assumes Fiona is not young. "}
{"id": 54, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Charlie is green. Charlie is red. Erin is round. Fiona is blue. Fiona is nice. Fiona is round. Harry is red. All red, green things are smart. Smart, blue things are red. All red things are rough. Nice things are green. All rough things are round. If Erin is nice then Erin is smart. All green, blue things are red. All round things are nice.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Harry is smart.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nHypothesis says Harry is smart.\nBy the first two premises, red things are smart and nice things are green.\nSince we know that Harry is red and Erin is nice, both of them are smart.\nTherefore, the hypothesis is true.", "feedback": "The penultimate sentence has incorrect logic because Erin has no bearing on Harry being smart or not. While the conclusion reached is correct, the means is not. The correct answer should be as follows: since All red, green things are smart, and Harry is Red, we only need to know whether he is green now. We know that all red things are rough, all rough things are round, all round things are nice, and nice things are green. Therefore, Harry is red and green and thus smart. The answer is that the hypothesis is indeed correct. "}
{"id": 55, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Anne is cold. Anne is red. Bob is big. Bob is kind. Erin is green. Erin is red. Harry is big. If Erin is kind then Erin is red. Red, furry things are rough. If something is green and rough then it is kind. If something is cold then it is furry. Green things are cold. All furry, big things are cold. All kind things are big. If Anne is furry then Anne is cold.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Anne is big.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nIf Anne is big then she is also kind (from the hypothesis and the fact that all kind things are big). But Anne is not kind (given in the premises). Therefore the hypothesis that Anne is big must be false.", "feedback": "Anne is cold. All furry, big things are cold. There is no indication that Anne is furry but if Anne is furry then Anne is cold. The answer can not make a statement that Anne is not kind because not enough information is given to come to this conclusion. Justification is not stated in the Anne is not kind statement except to say \"(given in the premises)\"."}
{"id": 56, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Bob is white. Erin is kind. Gary is not kind. Gary is quiet. Harry is quiet. Harry is smart. Harry is white. All white people are smart. If someone is red and white then they are smart. Cold, kind people are smart. Cold people are not red. All blue, smart people are red. If someone is smart and kind then they are blue. If someone is white and smart then they are kind. If Bob is red then Bob is quiet.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Bob is quiet.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nIf Bob is red then he is quiet. We know Bob is white, so the hypothesis \"Bob is quiet\" is False.", "feedback": "The answer basically states that we know that Bob is white, so he is not red. While this makes sense on a common sense level, it is not stated that one can only be one colour exclusively. Therefore, the correct answer should be yes, because Bob is, as per the premises in the context, white, smart, kind, blue, red and hence quiet."}
{"id": 57, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Dave is not big. Dave is blue. Erin is big. Fiona is not furry. Harry is not big. Harry is furry. Harry is quiet. If something is furry and smart then it is cold. If Fiona is blue then Fiona is furry. All cold things are white. If something is big and furry then it is smart. If something is blue then it is smart. All quiet things are furry. If Fiona is white then Fiona is quiet. Big things are quiet. White, furry things are quiet.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Harry is smart.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\nIf Harry is smart then he is furry and big. But Harry is not big, so the hypothesis is false.", "feedback": "On first glance, the answer seems correct because one condition that is mentioned for being smart is being big and furry, while Harry is furry but not big. But another condition for being smart is that something is blue. We are not given information about Harry's color, so we can't determine if that condition is met and thus cannot answer the question"}
{"id": 58, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Anne is quiet. Dave is big. Dave is blue. Dave is furry. Dave is green. Dave is quiet. Dave is smart. Erin is big. Erin is green. Erin is red. Gary is furry. Gary is green. All big people are smart. If Dave is smart and Dave is green then Dave is quiet. If someone is green then they are big. All quiet people are red. Green, red people are blue. Smart people are quiet. If Anne is furry and Anne is smart then Anne is green.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Gary is not quiet.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nHypothesis: Gary is not quiet.\nAssumption 1: All smart people are quiet. (from the premise \"Smart people are quiet\")\nAssumption 2: Gary is smart. (from the sentence \"Gary is green. ... Green, red people are blue. Smart people are quiet.\")\nConclusion: Gary is not quiet.\n\nThe hypothesis is wrong because one of the assumptions is false.\nSpecifically, Assumption 1 is false because although Dave and Anne are both smart and quiet, Gary might be neither smart nor quiet.", "feedback": "The context states that If someone is green then they are big, all big people are smart. and smart people are quiet so Gary is quiet since he's smart. The answer still states that \"Gary might be neither smart nor quiet\" when it is already explained in the context.\n"}
{"id": 59, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Bob is smart. Bob is white. Dave is blue. Gary is big. Gary is white. Harry is big. Harry is blue. All blue, rough things are white. Rough, quiet things are big. Red, rough things are big. All big things are rough. All white things are rough. All smart, blue things are quiet. All red things are blue. All blue, red things are smart. All rough, white things are red.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Bob is rough.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nIf Bob is rough, then he is white (by the first premise and the second premise). But Dave is blue and he is also rough (by the third premise), which contradicts the previous conclusion that only white things are rough. Hence, the hypothesis that Bob is rough is not correct.", "feedback": "The answer focuses on seeming contradictions in the context when the only important elements to answer the question is that Bob is white and that all white things are rough. "}
{"id": 60, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Anne is cold. Anne is furry. Anne is young. Bob is cold. Bob is furry. Bob is young. Fiona is rough. Gary is furry. Gary is nice. Gary is rough. If someone is young then they are white. All smart, rough people are nice. All rough people are young. If Fiona is nice and Fiona is cold then Fiona is smart. If someone is white then they are smart. Nice people are furry. All nice people are white.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Fiona is not nice.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is a logical deduction:\n\nFiona is not nice.\nNice people are furry.\nTherefore, Fiona is not furry.\nThe hypothesis (\"Fiona is not nice\") is true, so the deduction must also be true. \nHence, we can conclude that Fiona is not cold or young either (since if she were either of those things then she would be nice, but she isn't).\nTherefore, the hypothesis is correct.", "feedback": "The answer contradicts information given in the context. Specifically that Fiona is not young - but it is mentioned that Fiona is rough and that all rough people are young. Similarly, the answer ignores the statement that nice people are furry and that all smart, rough people are nice. Since it is established that young people are white and all nice people are white, Fiona must be nice, which contradicts the hypothesis"}
{"id": 61, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Anne is green. Erin is round. Fiona is big. Fiona is green. Fiona is red. Fiona is round. Harry is big. Harry is green. Harry is nice. Harry is red. All nice things are round. If something is blue then it is green. Blue, furry things are red. All blue, red things are green. Big things are blue. Blue things are round. If something is round then it is big. Green, blue things are furry.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Erin is not furry.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\nIf Erin is not furry, then she must be bald. If she is bald, then she is either red or green. But we know that all bald things are blue, so she must be blue. However, we also know that blue things are round and Erin is not round, so our hypothesis is false.\nTherefore, the hypothesis is not correct.", "feedback": "The answer is correct but the reasoning isn't. It makes an argument based on someone being bald, which is not mentioned in the context. "}
{"id": 62, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Anne is cold. Anne is quiet. Anne is smart. Anne is young. Bob is cold. Bob is nice. Bob is young. Gary is quiet. Gary is smart. Gary is young. Harry is green. Quiet, furry things are cold. Green things are young. If something is young and smart then it is quiet. If something is quiet and green then it is furry. All furry, cold things are nice. If Anne is furry and Anne is smart then Anne is cold. If something is green then it is smart.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Harry is cold.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the solution step by step:\n\nAnne is cold.\nBob is cold.\nGary is cold.\nHarry is cold.\nHypothesis: Harry is cold.\nThe hypothesis is correct.", "feedback": "The answer didn't arrive at the hypothesis with the right steps. \nHarry is green\nGreen things are young\nIf something is green then it is smart\nIf something is young and smart then it is quit\nIf something is green and quite then it is furry\nIf Anne is furry and Anne is smart then Anne is cold.\nSo, since Harry is furry and Harry is smart, then Harry is cold."}
{"id": 63, "dataset": "proofwriter", "question": "Bob is white. Charlie is furry. Charlie is green. Charlie is red. Charlie is smart. Charlie is young. Dave is white. Gary is green. Gary is red. Gary is smart. If Gary is green and Gary is blue then Gary is young. Furry things are green. All red, young things are smart. White things are red. Furry things are smart. If something is red then it is young. Furry, young things are green. Young, smart things are furry.\n\nHere is a hypothesis: Charlie is blue.\n\nIs the hypothesis correct? Here are three options:\nNo.\nYes.\nUnknown.\n\nChoose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the justification for the answer:\n\nIf Charlie is blue then by the second rule Gary must also be blue. But according to the third rule only young things are blue so Gary must be young. But according to the fourth rule only smart things are young so Gary must be smart. But according to the first rule Dave is the only one who is both white and smart therefore Gary cannot be smart and thus the original assumption that Charlie is blue must be incorrect.\n\nTherefore the hypothesis is incorrect.", "feedback": "The answer goes off on a logical tangent, when the most important thing seems to be that no conditions for being blue are given. It is only mentioned that Gary is blue but nothing else about having this color characteristic. Apart from being redundant information, The answer also says that \"Dave is the only one who is both white and smart and therefore Gary cannot be smart\", however this has no logical bearing on Charlie. The correct answer is that this hypothesis is unknowable given the context."}
{"id": 64, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How to make Lemon slushies at home.", "answer": "Use Ice tray to freeze Lemonade. Use from carton at grocery stores. When lemon (Ice) is frozen, place ice cubes in a blender. Mix on low at first then raise speed. Add 1/2 cup fresh lemon juice with 1/4 cup salt. When blended serve in a dish.", "feedback": "Everything is correct, except that it makes a big error when it substitutes one of the recommended ingredients (sugar), with another [salt], which will ruin the recipe and lead to an awful user experience."}
{"id": 65, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "What can I do if my coffee maker breaks and I badly need coffee?", "answer": "Take a coffee filter, pour the grounds out, tie the top and put in a large bowl of hot water and let it seep as you would a tea bag.", "feedback": "The answer says to pour the grounds out, but you should pour them in the coffee filter to apply this method."}
{"id": 66, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How do I build walls when making a sunroom addition to a house?", "answer": "Frame the walls, fasten the sheeting to the outside. Put a foam gasket between the brick of the existing house and the stud that is touching the house. Put bolts through that stud to attach it to the back yard.", "feedback": "The answer is perfect, until it makes the fatal mistake of suggestion to attach to the back yard, which isn't possible, instead of to the existing house. This faulty step in the recommendation will lead to user confusion and an overall terrible experience."}
{"id": 67, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How do you vacuum detritus off the surface of the sandbed in an aquarium?", "answer": "The easiest way to clean detritus from the sand in an aquarium is to use a long, flexible piece of plastic tubing. Start a syphon, and use the tubing to vacuum the bottom, syphoning the dirty water and detritus into a bucket to be added back to the tank.", "feedback": "The detritus is not to be added back to the tank but to be dispossed afterwards."}
{"id": 68, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "To write using duct tape, how should I make the cuts with a craft knife?", "answer": "Cut lines slowly and carefully in the center of the block letters you drew on the tape, or use a stencil and cut along the borders of the letters you want.", "feedback": "Cutting in the center of the letter wouldn't help, one would need to cut around the edges. "}
{"id": 69, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "To send a letter in the mail,", "answer": "write the return address on the front, center of the envelope. Place the required amount of postage onto the envelope in the top right corner. Write the destination address in the top left corner.", "feedback": "In order to send a letter, one needs to write the destination address, not the return address."}
{"id": 70, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How do you uncover a straw?", "answer": "Remove the paper around the straw by tearing a hole at one end. Pickup the straw and blow on the open end.", "feedback": "Blowing on the open end won't help. After tearing a hole at the end of the paper, the rest can be pulled from the other side to release the straw."}
{"id": 71, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How to trim white margin from map printout.", "answer": "Using a knife, cut away from the edge where the map ends and the white margin begins. Do this around all edges.", "feedback": "You can't use a knife to cut a piece of paper. A pair of scissors should be used."}
{"id": 72, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "How to milk a cow.", "answer": "Put the stool behind the cow, reach between the hind legs and pull on the udders. Be sure to have a container for the milk to fall into.", "feedback": "One doesn't sit behind a cow to milk it, one sits next to the cow."}
{"id": 73, "dataset": "PIQA", "question": "Clean leather seat cushion", "answer": "mix a solution of warm water and dish soap, dip a soft cloth into it, wring it out and wipe the surface. Use a second clean, damp cloth to wipe off the soap. Dry with a scour pad.", "feedback": "A scour pad is not needed for drying the chair "}
{"id": 74, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nWorking people frequently ask retired people what they do to make their days interesting . Well , for example , the other day I went downtown and into a shop . I was only there for about 5 minutes , and when I came out , there was a cop writing out a parking ticket . I said to him , \" Come on , man , how about giving a retired person a break ? \"\n\nGiven the above context, Why might the cop be giving me ticket ?", "answer": "I was speeding to get to a shop before they closed .", "feedback": "The context states that the person saw the cop writing a \"parking ticket\" there's no way he was driving or speeding as insinuated by the answer "}
{"id": 75, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nBecause I have the fan on the floor but it 's hot in my apartment . This sucks balls . But I ' m going to bed soon . I had my infusion yesterday , and as always , it 's made me feel like a new person . Not enough to make me do jumping jacks or anything like that , but at least I feel like an upright human being rather than a bent over 96 year old .\n\nGiven the above context, What is the reason an Infusion makes you feel like a new person ?", "answer": "It makes you feel like getting someone and getting their blood right away .", "feedback": "Feeling like a new person does not mean to literally get someone's blood "}
{"id": 76, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nThis week has been a heck of a lot better than last week . Actually , it 's been the best week I ' ve had in ages . On Tuesday I went into town with Debbie , mostly charity shop shoping , bought pretty much a whole outfit . I wore the top / dress thing that I bought then on Wednesday when I went into London with Drew .\n\nGiven the above context, What is meant by charity shop shopping with Debbie ?", "answer": "Charity shops are places that sell only logo items from the charity .. like Salvation Army Kettles , Easter Seals and such .", "feedback": "The context provides us with information that they bought a whole outfit there. This suggests clothing, and not \"logo items from the charity\" such as \"Salvation Army kettles\", as you can't wear those. Thus, the correct answer should be shopping clothes in a second-hand shop that are donated by other people"}
{"id": 77, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nhey family ! Sorry it took me a while to write , I ' ve been super busy since coming home from my hurrication ! I got in from the airport on sunday , and classes resumed monday morning .. full speed ahead!I absolutely love all my classes , my professors are great , I am still meeting tons of cool people , and i could n't ask for a better university !\n\nGiven the above context, Why do you suppose the author is so thrilled about the university they attend ?", "answer": "Since it took them so long to write , the universitys classes will help them write faster .", "feedback": "The sentence from the Context \"Sorry it took me a while to write\" is figurative and has nothing to do with their actual ability to write fast as mentioned in the Output. "}
{"id": 78, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\ni walked out into the hall and suddenly there were a bunch of people from back home and i got excited again . then i saw my buddy luc which got me real pumped 'cause i have n't seen him in forever 'cause he got sent away to boarding school or some shit . then i saw my friends sarah and paige and sarah was saying something like \" roman oh my god i have to tell you something \" because that is pretty much all she ever says anyway .\n\nGiven the above context, What happned right before Sarah said \" Oh my god i have to tell you something ? \"", "answer": "Luc got sent to boarding school .", "feedback": "While it is true that Luc got sent to a boarding school and that this happened before the situation with Sarah, this did not happen immediately before it. The correct answer should be that immediately before Sarah said her sentence, the author went into the hall and found several of her friends. The problem in the answer's output is that it does not logically follow the time frame of the events, and can't differentiate between what had happened before the main situation (author walking into the hall), and what happened immediately before Sarah said the sentence."}
{"id": 79, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nIt was shown for minutes on end after all ... And of course you got ta love Yuuko ! ! ! Thanks to her overbearing presence and totally unique character M got interested in watching Holic just the same . She 's seen the Movie already , but it 's different from the series after all .\n\nGiven the above context, What may happen after watching Hollic ?", "answer": "We may become uninterested in it .", "feedback": "In the context, it is said that the person did get interested, so it does not follow to conclude that \"we may become uninterested in it\". The correct answer should be that we may become more interested in Hollic after watching it."}
{"id": 80, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nCentral is amazing . We left earlier this morning after a long and tearful church service . All the churchins were really cool and nice and everything like always .. lol . So anyway , we took the long two hour ride up here , and unloaded EVERYTHING and then we went to dinner , and went shopping for more stuff , and everything was everything , and we got all set up .\n\nGiven the above context, How do I feel about Central ?", "answer": "I think it 's boring .", "feedback": "The answer says that Central is boring, but this does not logically follow as in the very first sentence in the context, it is said that \"Central is amazing\". The correct answer should be that I think Central is great."}
{"id": 81, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nI made it back in just in time before the rain . Since Miss Elmira did not have to prepare my dinner , I asked her to do my nails and luckily I found some red polish . Jamal called yesterday and he called back last night but it was lightning and I told him I would call him back . I was planning to call him back last night but I slept until 6:42 a.m. this morning .\n\nGiven the above context, Who is Miss Elmira ?", "answer": "She is the mayor of our town", "feedback": "The answer says that Miss Elmira is the mayor of their town, but this information is not found in the context. The correct answer should be that she is watching the author while her parents are out of town"}
{"id": 82, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nI am very confused . Just in case you were wondering I have tried to be friends with this girl many , many times . She makes it almost unbearable most of the time . I really do n't like to talk about people allot but I CAN'T TAKE ANY MORE ! ! !\n\nGiven the above context, What may be the reason she will not talk to me ?", "answer": "She has other friends that occupy her time", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer says that she has other friends that occupy her time and presents this as the reason for her not not talking to the author. However, this information cannot be found in the context. The correct reason would be that she does not want to be friends with the author. Secondly, Her \"having other friends that occupy her time\" is also an extremely unlikely reason for not talking to someone, and even if a person was this busy, they wouldn't \"make it unbearable\" as stated in the context."}
{"id": 83, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nWell , folks , this was our first day without any real new adventure ( which is ok with Kay ! ) , other than for the first time carefully picking our way in between wing dams ( long piles of rock below the surface to slow or direct downstream current ) outside the channel . The objective , of course , is to present as uninteresting a target as possible to the tows roaring up and down the river .\n\nGiven the above context, What may be the reason to travel down the river ?", "answer": "They are looking for something .", "feedback": "The answer is too vague because it says that \"they are looking for something\", which is not a sufficient answer. The correct answer should be that they are looking for fun adventures with their friends."}
{"id": 84, "dataset": "cosmosqa", "question": "Context:\nThe Royals won Sunday 14 - 3 over the Chicago White Sox . For the second day in a row the Royals offense pounded out 19 hits vs the Sox pitchers . The Royals took two of three from the Sox losing Friday night 2 - 4 , winning Saturday 9 - 7 and yesterday 14 - 3 .\n\nGiven the above context, What might a Royals fan think after these games ?", "answer": "They are happy that the White Sox won once .", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer is saying that Royals fans are happy because the White Sox won once. This is not a logical conclusion drawn from the context, because fans are happy if their own team wins, not the other. Thus, the correct answer should be that the fans are happy that their team won most of the games. Secondly, Them being happy that the other team won a game is not a logical conclusion given the context, because it doesn't make the fans happy if the opposing team wins any game. A fan is not happy if the other team wins a game. However, this could still make sense in a certain situation if the word \"only\" was added: \"They are happy that the White Sox won only once.\""}
{"id": 85, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nEdna Krabappel-Flanders is a fictional character from the animated television series \"The Simpsons\", who was voiced by Marcia Wallace until her death in 2013. She is the teacher of Bart Simpson's 4th grade class at Springfield Elementary School, and Ned Flanders's wife in later seasons.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nEdna Krabappel-Flanders is a female character.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes, it implies that she is a female character.\nSince Edna Krabappel-Flanders is a fictional character from The Simpsons, and all of the main characters in The Simpsons are human beings, then it follows logically that Edna Krabappel-Flanders is also a human being. And since Marcia Wallace was the voice actor for her, it follows logically that Edna Krabappel-Flanders is voiced by a woman. Therefore, she is a female character.", "feedback": "While the answer 'yes' is correct, the justification is flawed and is a non sequitur. Just because a character is voiced by a woman, it doesn't necessarily mean that the character in the show is female too. A counterexample would be that the voice actor who voices Bart Simpson is a woman. The correct answer should've been that the premise does imply the hypothesis because Edna is referred to as \"she\" in the context. "}
{"id": 86, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nInterim Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, has won a landslide victory in Sunday's presidential election and will succeed the late Yasser Arafat.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe election was not very close\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe premise states that Abbas won a landslide victory, but it doesn't say how close the election was. It is possible that the election wasn't very close, as the hypothesis suggests. But it is also possible that there were other candidates who got a significant number of votes, so that although Abbas won a landslide victory, the vote was still quite close.", "feedback": "The answer misunderstands the phrase \"landslide victory\". Landslide victory is an election result in which the victorious the answer or party wins by an overwhelming margin. Therefore, the vote could not have been \"still quite close\" as stated by the The answer, because it was the opposite. Therefore, the correct answer is that the premise does not imply the hypothesis."}
{"id": 87, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nThe 2006-07 New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets season was the team's 5th in the NBA. The Hornets split their games between the New Orleans Arena and the Ford Center, playing the majority of their schedule in Oklahoma City as they had in the previous season. The Hornets improved by one win, finishing 39-43, but failed to reach the playoffs.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe 2006-07 New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets underperformed.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The premise only establishes what happened - it doesn't attempt to say whether or not this was good or bad (i.e., if they underperformed, met expectations, or overperformed). \nTo determine whether or not they underperformed, you need additional information such as preseason predictions/expectations and how they compared against similar teams. \nFor example, if the team had been predicted to win 45 games and they won 39, then you could argue that they underperformed. On the other hand, if they were predicted to win 28 games and they won 39, then you could argue that they exceeded expectations.\nAdditional context:\nThis question came up in a discussion about sports betting, where one person argued that the Hornets \"obviously\" underperformed based on the premise above, while another person disagreed.", "feedback": "The answer doesn't answer the question. The hypothesis states that they underperformed and the fact that the Hornets failed to reach the playoffs shows that. The answer brings up information that wasn't asked. "}
{"id": 88, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nThe Merck family is a German family of industrialists and bankers, known for establishing the world's oldest pharmaceutical company Merck, its American former subsidiary Merck & Co. (MSD), which is now an independent company, as well as the Hamburg merchant bank H. J. Merck & Co. The family still owns the majority of the pharmaceutical company Merck.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nMerck & Co. is not owned by the Merck family\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The premise only mentions one company (Merck) being owned by the Merck family. \nTherefore the hypothesis could still be true if:\n* There is more than one pharmaceutical company owned by the Merck family\n* There are other companies not mentioned in the premise which are also owned by the Merck family\n* MSD was once owned by the Merck family but is no longer owned by them\n\nIn order for the hypothesis to be false, all of the following would have to be true:\n\n* There is only one pharmaceutical company named Merck\n* That company is listed on the stock exchange\n* The majority of shares in that company are not owned by members of the Merck family\n\nIn conclusion, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.", "feedback": "In the end, the answer states that the premise does not imply the hypothesis. However, the premise does imply the hypothesis since Mer & Co. is no longer owned by the Merk family and is now an independent company."}
{"id": 89, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nThe Inter-American Peace Force (IAPF) was established, by the Organization of American States, on 23 May 1965, after the United States's intervention in the Dominican Republic. It largely consisted of over 42,600 United States military personnel, plus the following troops were sent by each country;\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe Inter-American Peace Force was establish because of a Caribbean country\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis. \nHere is a counterexample:\nThe Inter-American Peace Force was established after the United States's intervention in the Dominican Republic. It largely consisted of over 42,600 United States military personnel. Additionally, Costa Rica sent 150 troops, Honduras sent 875 troops, Nicaragua sent 200 troops, Panama sent 1,800 troops, Paraguay sent 1,350 troops, Venezuela sent 2,000 troops, Bolivia sent 1,500 troops, Colombia sent 6,500 troops, Ecuador sent 1,250 troops, Peru sent 3,500 troops, Argentina sent 4,000 troops, Chile sent 3,750 troops, Brazil sent 11,300 troops, and Mexico sent 3,750 troops.\nNone of these countries are Caribbean nations. However, all of them participated in the Inter-American Peace Force.\nTherefore, the premise that the force was created because of a Caribbean country is false.", "feedback": "The answer bases is conclusion on the involvement of countries in the IAPF, which is not mentioned at all in the context. The hypothesis only considers as to why the IAPF was established, not who were member states. The answer is that because the IAPF was established because of a Caribbean country, and the Dominican Republic being a Caribbean country, that yes, it was established because of a Caribbean country."}
{"id": 90, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nGross Food<br>Ken was at a restaurant. His food took a long time to cook. When it finally arrived it was half frozen. Ken complained but nobody really cared. Ken left a bad review and never returned.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe food was more than a quarter frozen although it took a long time to arrive.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes, the premise implies the hypothesis.\nIf the food was less than a quarter frozen (or there was no ice at all), Ken would probably not complain and might even praise the restaurant for its fast service.\nIf the food was more than a quarter frozen but arrived quickly, Ken would still complain but some people might sympathize with the restaurant since they made an honest mistake (the food got cold while waiting for the slow customer).\nOnly if both conditions are met (food was very cold and took long to arrive) do we reach the conclusion of the hypothesis - that the food was \"more than a quarter frozen\".", "feedback": "Firstly, In the third sentence, the answer assumes the customer could be slow which would be a wrong assumption and was not stated in the context. Secondly, The answer contradicts with common sense that if the food was less than a quarter frozen, Ken would probably even praise the restaurant. If food is even a bit frozen, that makes for a negative experience. Cooked food should be served warm. The last sentence also jumps to arbitrary conclusions that because food was very cold and took long to arrive that food was more than a quarter frozen. Can't reach the conclusion that because the food was very cold and took long to arrive that it was a quantifiable measurement of \"more than a quarter frozen\". The correct answer is that the premise implies the hypothesis, because it states that it took a long time to cook and that it was half frozen. Half frozen suggests more than half."}
{"id": 91, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nI said I was upset about it because I didn't find a problem with it with my religion. It does not -- I'm getting confused. I have a problem with it because my daughter came home from school and she says to me, What kind of Christian are you, anyway? So that's why I have a problem with it.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe speaker is a parent.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nHere is a possible explanation for why you might think that the premise implies the hypothesis:\nThe speaker says they have a problem because their daughter asked them what kind of Christian they are. You may infer from this that the speaker is a Christian (otherwise their daughter wouldn't ask this question). And since the premise talks about having a problem with something that doesn't conflict with your religion, if you assume that the speaker is a Christian then you may also infer that the speaker's religion is Christianity.\nHowever, this inference is not guaranteed to be correct. It is possible that the speaker is not a Christian, but their child is, and the speaker is upset that their non-Christian views have caused their child to question their own faith. Or maybe the speaker is Jewish, and their child is converting to Christianity, and the speaker is upset that their child has chosen a different religion. Or any number of other possibilities.\nIn general, you should be cautious about making assumptions about people based on partial information.", "feedback": "Firstly, The The answer does not answer the question directly about whether or not the speaker is a parent but addresses irrelevant info about what religion the speaker is. Secondly, The context says \"my daughter\". It is commonsense that this means the speaker is a parent to the daughter in the context. "}
{"id": 92, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nShawn and Bethany Ohl of Ravenna announce the birth of their son, Bryson James Ohl. He arrived Dec. 1 at University Hospitals Portage Medical Center in Ravenna, weighing 8 pounds, 1 ounce. Syndey Ohl, 2, is the baby\u2019s big sister. Tim and Jan Vicars of Munroe Falls are the maternal grandparents. Paternal grandparents are Ron and Peggy Ohl of Garrettsville.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nShawn and Bethany Ohl have one child\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes. \n* If the second child had been a girl then they would have said so - e.g. \"Shawn and Bethany Ohl of Ravenna announce the birth of their son and daughter...\"\n* Similarly, if there were any other children they would also have been mentioned - e.g. \"Shawn and Bethany Ohl of Ravenna announce the birth of their third child, Bryson James Ohl. He arrived Dec. 1 at University Hospitals Portage Medical Center in Ravenna, weighing 8 pounds, 1 ounce. Syndey Ohl, 2, and Madison Ohl, 4, are the baby\u2019s big sisters.\"\n* By stating that Sydney is the baby's big sister we know that she is older than the baby. Therefore there cannot be any younger siblings.\n\nTherefore the only logical conclusion is that Shawn and Bethany Ohl have one child - Sydney.", "feedback": "Firstly, The context states that the new baby has an older sister so it's clear that the hypothesis that Shawn and Bethany Ohl have one child is incorrect but the answer comes to the conclusion using a lot of irrelevant other info about the weight of baby, date of arrival and so forth, that they have only one child - which is wrong. Secondly, A flaw in common sense when the context clearly states the new baby has a big sister. "}
{"id": 93, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nNew Zealand film director Peter Jackson is to make a 264-million-New Zealand-dollar (133 million U.S. dollars) trilogy based on Tolkien's fantasy classic \"Lord of The Rings,\" the local TV station reported Tuesday evening.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nPeter Jackson is to make a 263-million-New Zealand-dollar trilogy based on Tolkien's fantasy classic \"Lord of The Rings\".\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes.\nThe hypothesis is logically derived from the premise. \nIf we accept that Peter Jackson is to make a $133 million USD trilogy based on Lord of the Rings then it follows necessarily that he will also make a 264-million-New Zealand-dollar ($133M * 2 = $266M NZD$) trilogy based on Tolkien's fantasy classic \"Lord of The Rings\". \nNote however that the converse is not true - the hypothesis does not imply the premise. It is possible that Peter Jackson makes a $133M trilogy without making exactly $264M NZD$. For example if the exchange rate between US dollars and New Zealand Dollars changes during production such that $133M USD becomes worth more than $264M NZD$, then the statement in the premise would become false even though the statement in the hypothesis remains true.", "feedback": "Simply looking at the number of 264 million New Zealand dollars in the context and the 264 million NZ dollars in they hypothesis makes it clear that the 263 is incorrect. "}
{"id": 94, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nDying Lover<br>Sam loved his wife. They had been together for years. Sam's wife got cancer. There was no way to cure it. Sam suffered for years with her.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nSam's wife never married. \n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nHere is a proof:\nAssume that Sam's wife had been married before. Then she would have a husband at the time when she got cancer and died. Therefore, Sam wouldn't suffer for years with her. This contradicts the premise. Hence, the assumption must be false. Thus, Sam's wife never married.", "feedback": "The answer wants the reader to assume that Sam's wife had been married before as a means to justify their answer. However, Sam's wife can't be Sam's wife unless she's married to Sam. So knowing that Sam has a wife should have been enough proof to know that Sam's wife is married. It should have been commonsense. "}
{"id": 95, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nAustralian Broadcasting Company (ABC) television head, Sandra Levy, has quit to become the director of development for \"Channel Nine.\" Her new role is expected to focus on drama. ABC managing director Russell Balding said that Ms Levy had lifted audiences to \"historically unprecedented\" levels. However, Ms Levy came under fire during her ABC tenure for an overly conservative programming approach to major news stories - notably a sluggish response to coverage of the December 2004 South Asian Tsunami. She was criticised for refusing to interrupt regular programming to go to breaking news reports.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nSandra levy failed to interrupt the breaking news report of the tsunami for regular programming.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The premise talks about two things - her success at ABC and criticism for her response to tsunami coverage. These two facts don't necessarily contradict each other. She may have done very well overall, while still having made some serious mistakes. So the premise doesn't imply the hypothesis. ", "feedback": "The hypothesis states that Sandra levy failed to interrupt the breaking news report of the tsunami for regular programming but the answer is talking about her success at ABC and if it contradicts the criticism she received. "}
{"id": 96, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nAhmad Jovdat Ismayil oglu Hajiyev (June 18, 1917 - January 18, 2002) was one of the major Azerbaijani composers of the Soviet period. He is remembered for his monumental orchestral works, having been the first Azerbaijani to compose a symphony (1936). He studied under Azerbaijan's Founder of Composed Music, Uzeyir Hajibeyov and under Russian composer Dmitri Shostakovich.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nAhmad Jovdat Ismayil oglu Hajiyev died young\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "A premise is an assumption that something is true. It may or may not actually be true. If one accepts the premise as true, then logically one must also accept the conclusion (hypothesis). However, if you do not accept the premise as true, then you are free to reject the hypothesis.\nIn this case, the composer did in fact die at age 84, which is not particularly young. So we might conclude that the premise is false. But perhaps there is additional information we don't know: Maybe all of his contemporaries lived past 100, making him young by comparison. We would need more information to determine whether the premise is true or false.\nIt is possible for a valid argument to have a false premise and still produce a true conclusion. Such an argument is called unsound. An argument is valid if its form is such that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. In logic, we often examine arguments independently of their content - focusing only on their structure. You can test the validity of an argument without knowing anything about the topic under discussion. You simply look at how the statements are linked together and see if there is a logical connection between them.", "feedback": "According to the context, Ahmad Jovdat Ismayil oglu Hajiyev lived for almost 85 years, which is not young. The answer says \"we might conclude that the premise is false\" which does not answer the question. The answer also brings up information that is not relevant such as what a premise is and the fact that Admad's contemporaries maybe \"lived past 100, making him young by comparison\". The answer concludes that we don't have enough information which is incorrect because we were given Ahmad's birth date and death date in the context which is all we need to determine if the premise implies the hypothesis."}
{"id": 97, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nYeji is a town in south Ghana and is the capital of Pru District of the Brong-Ahafo Region in Ghana. Yeji is in the north-east of Brong-Ahafo Region, and is adjacent to Lake Volta. Yeji is connected by highway to Ejura and Kwadjokrom. It had a population of 29,515 at the census of 2010.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nYeji's population was 485 away from being 30,000 in 2010.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "The hypothesis is not implied by the premise. \nThe reason is that there are two possible scenarios where the premise is true but the hypothesis is false:\nScenario A: In 2010, Yeji's population was exactly 30,000.\nScenario B: In 2010, Yeji's population was slightly more than 30,000 (say 30,005).\nIn both cases, the premise (\"Yeji had a population of 29,515 at the census of 2010\") is true, but the hypothesis (\"Yeji's population was 485 away from being 30,000 in 2010\") is false.", "feedback": "A simple mathematical calculation would have easily answered this question. 29,515 + 485 = 30,000. Instead, the answer ignores the arithmetic question posed, and incorrectly answers that the hypothesis is not implied by the premise. The correct answer would be that the hypothesis is correct, because adding 485 to a population 29,515, would have brought the population to 30,000 in 2010. "}
{"id": 98, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nHow to become a member of the ymca<br>Visit your local ymca and see if its facilities will meet your needs. Ymca staff take prospective members on guided tours of the site and can answer all membership questions. Services vary from one facility to another, so be sure to ask about programs of special interest to you.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nYou have to go into a ymca to become a member.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "A premise is an assumption that something is true. Anything implied by a set of premises is also considered true, if the premises are true.\nIn this case, the premise states that you need to visit a YMCA and talk with staff in order to determine if membership will meet your needs. It doesn't state explicitly that you must become a member after doing these things; however, it is certainly implied - otherwise there would be no reason to do so.", "feedback": "The answer doesn't answer the question of \"does this premise imply the hypothesis? The answer was \"it doesn't state explicitly that you must become a member after doing these things\" but the context never said anything about having to become a member after visiting a YMCA. The answer misunderstands the context which is about steps to become a member of YMCA, and the first step is to visit it. Therefore, the correct answer is that the premise does imply the hypothesis, because visiting YMCA is the first step in becoming a member. \n\n"}
{"id": 99, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nHonourable senators, this oversight by the federal government will mean that the Mtis will not even be able to take part in the process to select the six aboriginal members of the board, because the Mtis National Council is not recognized as an aboriginal government and has no land as defined in the Indian Act.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe Mtis National Council will not take part in the aboriginal board members selection\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis. \nThe premise talks about an \"oversight\" by the federal government. It implies that the federal government should have included M\u00e9tis National Council in the process but did not. However, it doesn't say anything about what consequences this oversight has. The hypothesis states one possible consequence of this oversight - that M\u00e9tis National Council will not take part in selecting aboriginal board members. But there may be other consequences (or none at all). For example, the federal government may correct its oversight and include MNC in the selection process after all.", "feedback": "The answer focuses on the \"oversight\" and brings up information that isn't relevant to the question such as the possibility that the government \"may correct its oversight and include MNC\". The answer should have been yes, the premise does imply the hypothesis because it is explicitly stated in the context that Mtis National Council will not be able to take part in the selection process because of the oversight."}
{"id": 100, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nThe American Combat Association is a small mixed martial arts company founded by Olympic wrestler, world Abu Dhabi champion and UFC fighter Kamal Shalorus and professional mixed martial arts fighter, Broadcaster and American professional wrestler Matthew \"The Granimal\" Granahan. \n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nAll of the American Combat Association founders are fighters of some kind\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe premise states that the founders of ACA are Kamal Shalorus and Matthew \"Granimal\" Granahan. It says nothing about them being fighters (although it's likely true). The hypothesis states that all of the founders of ACA are fighters. That would include anyone else who helped start the company but was not mentioned in the premise. Perhaps there is another founder who doesn't fight.\nTo prove the hypothesis you would need to show that every founder of ACA is a fighter. You could do this by listing all of the founders and showing that each one is a fighter. Or you could find a list of the founders somewhere and see if everyone on the list is a fighter. ", "feedback": "The context clearly states that one of the founder is an Olympic wrestler, world Abu Dhabi champion and the other is a professional mixed martial arts fighter so the American Combat Association founders are definitely fighters . "}
{"id": 101, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nRanila is a village in the Charkhi Dadri district of the Indian state of Haryana. It lies approximately 30 km south east of the district headquarters town of Bhiwani. As of the 2011 Census of India , the village had 1,927 households with a population of 10,199 of which 5,393 were male and 4,806 female. The nearby villages are Bhageshwari 5\u00a0km, Sanjarwas 4\u00a0km, Pilana 2.5\u00a0km etc.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nthere are 6 people per household on average\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, it implies that there are at least 6 people per household on average: if each of the 10199 inhabitants lives in one of the 1927 households, then we have exactly 6 persons per household; if some inhabitants don't live in any of these households (e.g., because they live in some other village), then the number of people per household is even larger than 6.\nBut this implication only holds if all of the following additional assumptions hold:\n\n* There are no non-resident owners of houses in Ranila who do not live in Ranila.\n* All residents of Ranila live in one of the 1927 households.\n* The government of India has perfect knowledge of how many people live in each of the 1927 households in Ranila.\n\nIt might well be that some of these additional assumptions don't hold. For example, it seems likely that some of the houses in Ranila are owned by rich industrialists living in Gurgaon or Delhi, but who use them as weekend homes. These owners would not count as part of the population of Ranila according to the census, yet they would increase the number of people per household.", "feedback": "The answer does not show us which step was used to obtain the 6 persons per household."}
{"id": 102, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nMike Snider, (born May 5, 1961), is an American bluegrass banjo player and humorist. He learned to play banjo at the age of 16. Although he is well known for irreverent humor, he is a well respected banjo player. Much of his comedy is based on stories about his wife, Sabrina, referred to as Sweetie.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nMike Snider is not well known for his humor, but he is a respected banjo player.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Premises can imply a hypothesis but they don't have to. In this case your premise does imply your hypothesis. \nHere is a counterexample where a premise does not imply a hypothesis:\nPremise: All humans are mortal.\nHypothesis: Socrates is mortal.\nThese statements are logically consistent with one another; if the premise is true then the hypothesis is also true, but you could imagine a world where the premise was false (perhaps there are immortal aliens who look human) in which case the hypothesis might still be true or false.\nIn order for a premise to imply a hypothesis it must be the case that if the premise is true then the hypothesis must also be true. In the example you gave, if the premise is true then the hypothesis must also be true. If Mike Snider really is well known for his humor then it is necessarily the case that he is not just a respected banjo player but also well known for his humor.", "feedback": "The answer says that the premise does imply the hypothesis but that is incorrect because the hypothesis says \"Mike Snider is not well known for his humor\". The hypothesis is wrong because the context states \"he is well known for his irreverent humor\". The answer also brings up information that isn't relevant to the question like what a premise is. They do that in the first sentence, in the body of their text, and then again at the end. The answer also gives multiple examples of different hypotheses and premises for example \"premise: all humans are mortal. Hypothesis: Socrates is mortal\". Then it's done again in the body of the text where he mentions the aliens. Lots of "}
{"id": 103, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nHow to become an academic<br>Learn about being an academic. Someone who pursues an academic career often works at a university or research institution in a specific discipline such as biology, history, or political science. During their graduate program, academics generally spend 1 or more years working as teaching assistants at a college or university.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nYou can learn about how to peruses an academic career\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis. \nThe premise talks about what an academic is and how one can become an academic. It describes certain general steps that one must take to pursue an academic career (i.e., getting a graduate degree and gaining teaching experience).\nHowever, the hypothesis makes a much more specific claim: that you can learn how to pursue an academic career. While it is true that you will likely need to learn many things in order to become an academic (e.g., the methods and concepts in your field), the premise does not explicitly state or imply that learning is necessary or sufficient for becoming an academic. ", "feedback": "The answer says that the premise doesn't imply the hypothesis but the context begins with \"how to become an academic\" and then discusses it. The answer says that the article only talks about \"what an academic is and how one can become an academic\" but not how to pursue an academic career. That doesn't make much sense. "}
{"id": 104, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nTomato sauce (also known as Neapolitan sauce, and referred to in Italy as Salsa di pomodoro) refers to any of a very large number of sauces made primarily from tomatoes, usually to be served as part of a dish (rather than as a condiment). Tomato sauces are common for meat and vegetables, but they are perhaps best known as sauces for pasta dishes.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nNeapolitan sauce, tomato sauce and Salsa di pomodoro are all the same thing. \n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe premise describes a set of sauces made from tomatoes (among other ingredients). This set includes Neapolitan sauce, tomato sauce and Salsa di pomodoro but may include additional types of sauces as well.\nThe hypothesis states that these three specific sauces are identical. However, it is possible that they differ in taste, texture or other properties because they use different recipes.", "feedback": "The answer says the set of sauces described in the premise may include additional types of sauces when it is made clear in the first sentence of the premise that it is about sauces made out of tomatoes."}
{"id": 105, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nSEOUL, July 25 South Korea's CLIO Cosmetics applied for preliminary exchange approval for an initial public offering (IPO), Korea Exchange said on Monday. The filing came after an investment arm of French luxury goods giant LVMH said on Friday it took a minority stake in the cosmetics firm, the latest bet by global investors on booming demand for Korean beauty products in major markets such as China. (Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin; Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips)\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nFrench companies think Korean beauty products are going to do well in China.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, if French companies think Korean beauty products are going to do well in China then they would invest in them. However there may be other reasons why LVMH took a minority stake in CLIO Cosmetics such as:\n\n* They want to learn from their expertise in selling cosmetic products online directly to consumers. \n* They want to increase their portfolio of brands especially in Asia. \n* They want to acquire new technologies developed by CLio Cosmetics. \n* They want to get access to CLio Cosmetics distribution network especially in Asia. \n\nIn conclusion, while the fact that LVMH took a minority stake in CLIO Cosmetics implies that they believe Korean beauty products will do well in China, there may be other factors that influenced their decision.", "feedback": "The answer misunderstands the question. The correct answer is yes and this needs to be backed up by reasoning. This does not ask for opinions. "}
{"id": 106, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nNandan Mehta (26 February 1942 \u2013 26 March 2010) was an Indian tabla player and music teacher from Ahmedabad who belonged to the Benaras Gharana of Hindustani classical music. He established Saptak School of Music and started Saptak Annual Festival of Music in 1980.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nNandan Mehta was born on February 25, 1942 and died on March 27, 2010.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Yes, the hypothesis can be logically deduced from the premise.\nHere is a formal proof:\nPremise: \nNandan Mehta (26 February 1942 \u2013 26 March 2010) was an Indian tabla player and music teacher from Ahmedabad who belonged to the Benaras Gharana of Hindustani classical music.\nHypothesis: \nNandan Mehta was born on February 25, 1942 and died on March 27, 2010.\n\nStep 1: Replace every date in the premise with its corresponding number (we will do this for convenience; we don\u2019t actually need to do this):\nNandan Mehta (26*12+42 = 328 \u2013 26*3+10 = 96 \u2013 26*1+2 = 52) was an Indian tabla player and music teacher from Ahmedabad who belonged to the Benaras Gharana of Hindustani classical music.\nStep 2: Simplify:\nNandan Mehta was 328-96+52 = 284 years old.\nStep 3: Plug 284 into the first part of the hypothesis:\nNandan Mehta was born on February 25, 1942 \u2192 25 + 284 = 309.\nStep 4: Plug 284 into the second part of the hypothesis:\nNandan Mehta died on March 27, 2010 \u2192 27 + 284 = 311.\nStep 5: Since 309 < 311, the hypothesis is true.", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer does not match the correct answer and shows lack of understanding of basic dates stated in the context. the answer is no and this is justified by stating the correct dates of birth and death Feb. 26 and Mar. 26 respectively. Secondly, The answer mentions that Nandan Mehta was 284 years old in his Step 2. Since people can't live that long, it should be clear at this point that the suggested steps and its approach of replacing dates with the corresponding number does not help (apart from being totally redundant and irrelevant). There is a clear lack of common sense since this is a question that can be answered without any mathematical approaches. "}
{"id": 107, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nHow to paint ceiling edges<br>Apply some blue painter's tape to the walls where they meet the ceiling. The tape will help protect the walls from drips or from accidental smears. Press the tape down on the wall as tightly as possible to keep any excess paint from leaking in behind it.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe blue painters tape stops leaks\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis. \nThe premise states that blue painter's tape will help protect the walls from drips or smears. It does not state that it will completely prevent drips or smudges, which means that there may still be some paint that gets through and leaks onto the wall. The fact that the tape helps with this problem does not mean that it solves the problem completely.\nAnother way to think of it: If someone told you \"this medicine will help cure your cold,\" would you assume that it would definitely cure your cold? Probably not, because you know that no medication is 100% effective at treating illnesses. Similarly, when you read that the tape will help keep the paint off the walls, you should not assume that it will keep all of the paint off of the walls.", "feedback": "The answer didn't understand the hypothesis. The hypothesis simply states \"The blue painters tape stops leaks\" this is correct because as mentioned in the context, when the tape is pressed down on the wall as tightly as possible, it will keep or stop any excess paint from leaking."}
{"id": 108, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nNorth High Bridge Park is a 0.85 acre city park located on the east bank bluffs above the Mississippi River in Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States. The park is adjacent to the High Bridge and was created when the new High Bridge was finished in 1987. The park includes gardens, sculptures and an overlook of the Mississippi River.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nNorth High Bridge Park is more than 0.86 acres in size.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe premise only states that the park is 0.85 acres, it doesn't say anything about whether or not it is more than that. It's possible that the park is exactly 0.85 acres, or less than 0.85 acres, or even more than 0.86 acres. \nAnother way to see this is by thinking about what would have to be true if the implication were correct. If the premise implies the hypothesis, then if we assume the premise is true, we must also conclude that the hypothesis is true. But clearly, if we assume the premise is true, it's still possible that the hypothesis is false. For example, maybe the park really is exactly 0.85 acres.", "feedback": "The context is clear that the park is a 0.85 acre park and the hypothesis states it is more than 0.86, therefore the premise does not imply the hypothesis. "}
{"id": 109, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nSenator Kerry, after 9/11 -- and this is a new question for you -- it seemed to me that the country came together as I've never seen it come together since World War II. But some of that seems to have melted away. I think it's fair to say we've become pretty polarized, perhaps because of the political season.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nSenator Kerry contains a q\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, if by \"some of that seems to have melted away\" you mean all of it. \nSeriously though, no, this premise does not imply the hypothesis. It could be the case that Senator Kerry contains a q without any effect whatsoever on how much the country comes together in times of crisis. Or perhaps there is some correlation between these two things, but it goes in the opposite direction from what you suggest; maybe people are less likely to come together when Senator Kerry is around. Or perhaps there was some third factor that caused both the increase in unity after 9/11 and the decrease later on, such as George W Bush being president at those times. \nTo conclude, while this premise certainly does not entail the hypothesis, it might still be evidence for it. You would need to look at other factors and see which one best explains the data point you're interested in.", "feedback": "Firstly, The answer goes off topic and does not address the hypothesis at all. They hypothesis states Senator Kerry contains a q. We can assume this means Senator Kerry's name contains the letter q. The answer misunderstands this entirely. Secondly, The correct answer is that the premise does not imply the hypothesis. "}
{"id": 110, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nI do. I think that in this 21st century we will soon see the consequences of what's called global warming. There was a study just a few weeks ago suggesting that in summertime the north polar ice cap will be completely gone in 50 years. Already people see the strange weather conditions that the old timers say they've never seen before in their lifetimes.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe speaker think that global warming is harmful.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, it implies that *if* global warming happens (which is assumed by the speaker), then it will have consequences. It doesn't say whether those consequences are good or bad - they might be good! Imagine a world where Siberia becomes habitable and agriculturally productive. That would be great for humanity.\nSo while the premise implies the hypothesis if you add an additional assumption (that the consequences of global warming are negative), it doesn't actually state that assumption explicitly.\nIt's possible to interpret the statement as saying that global warming has already happened (\"we see the strange weather conditions\"), so the consequence (\"the north polar ice cap will be completely gone\") is already guaranteed to happen, so we don't need to worry about whether it will happen or not, we should just prepare for it. However this interpretation seems rather forced.", "feedback": "The answer states we can imagine a world where Siberia becomes habitable but this ignores the context that north polar ice cap will be gone in 50 years which could flood Siberia."}
{"id": 111, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nLouis Armstrong (1901\u20131971), nicknamed Satchmo or Pops, was an American trumpeter, composer, singer and occasional actor who was one of the most influential figures in jazz. His career spanned five decades, from the 1920s to the 1960s, and different eras in jazz.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nLouis Armstrong was 70 when he died\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nThe reason is that the premise only talks about his career, but the hypothesis makes a claim on his age at death. The fact that someone's career spans several decades does not imply that they lived for more than 70 years (they could have started their career very young).\nFor instance, Mozart's career as a composer lasted less than 30 years (he died at age 35), while Michelangelo's lasted over 80 years (he died at age 89).", "feedback": "The answer talks about Louis Armstrong's career from the 2nd sentence on. When he started his career has no relevance to what age he was when he died. The correct answer would be that he was either 69 or 70 when he died because we don't have the exact dates of his death. "}
{"id": 112, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nSt. John Richardson Liddell (September 6, 1815 \u2013 February 14, 1870) was a prominent Louisiana planter who served as a general in the Confederate States Army during the American Civil War. He was an outspoken proponent of Southern emancipation of slaves. Liddell was murdered by a former Confederate Officer near his home in 1870.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nSt. John Richardson Liddell was southern\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.\nHere is a counterexample:\nGeorge Washington was a prominent Virginia planter who served as a general in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. He owned hundreds of slaves but advocated for their eventual emancipation. Washington died of natural causes in 1799.", "feedback": "The counter example provided is not relevant and does not explain why it's relevant or why it would disprove the hypothesis. The correct answer is that St. John Richardson Liddell was Southern because he was a prominent Louisiana planter and served in the Confederate Sates Army which is Southern. "}
{"id": 113, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nMount Willey is a mountain located in Grafton County, New Hampshire. The mountain is named after Samuel Willey, Jr. (1766\u20131826) and his family, who in 1825 moved into a house in Crawford Notch. The family was killed a year later in August 1826 during a landslide.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe family was killed in the house in Crawford Notch.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "Sure, the premise implies that hypothesis.\nIf we accept the premise as true (i.e., that Mount Willey is named after Samuel Willey Jr. and his family), then it follows logically that the family existed, moved into a house in Crawford Notch, and were later killed during a landslide. \nIt should be noted that this is an example of affirming the consequent, which is a logical fallacy. Just because one event happens after another, it does not mean that the first event caused the second. In other words, the fact that the mountain was named after them implies that they existed and died there, but it does not imply that their deaths were directly caused by the landslide. It is possible that they died of natural causes, for instance, and were buried under the landslide afterwards. ", "feedback": "The answer does not follow the context logically. Whether Mount Willey is named after Samual Willey Jr. and his family and the family existing is not the hypothesis. The answer proposes that maybe their deaths were not caused directly by the landslide, this contradicts the last sentence of the context. "}
{"id": 114, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nLeavitt Peak is located in the Emigrant Wilderness near Sonora Pass in the eastern Sierra Nevada range of California. Leavitt Peak is located on the Tuolumne County - Mono County line. The Pacific Crest Trail runs close to the east of Leavitt Peak, at an elevation of about 10800 ft elevation. The peak offers views south to Yosemite National Park and north towards South Lake Tahoe.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nThe Pacific Crest Trail has an elevation of over 10000 feet.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the premise doesn\u2019t imply the hypothesis.\nHere is a proof by contradiction:\nSuppose the premise implies the hypothesis. Then, if the Pacific Crest Trail had an elevation less than 10000 feet, then Leavitt Peak would not have an elevation greater than 10000 feet. However, according to Google Earth, the peak has an elevation of 12389 feet, which contradicts the assumption that the trail has an elevation less than 10000 feet. Therefore, the premise does not imply the hypothesis.", "feedback": "In the 2nd to last sentence, the answer makes a false assumption that the trail has an elevation less than 10,000 ft. when context states Leavitt Peak's elevation is about 10,800 ft. which would make the elevation more not less than 10K ft. The correct answer is that, yes, the Pacific Trail has an elevation of over 10K ft. because of Leavitt Peak. "}
{"id": 115, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nJohn Laurens (October 28, 1754 \u2013 August 27, 1782) was an American soldier and statesman from South Carolina during the American Revolutionary War, best known for his criticism of slavery and efforts to help recruit slaves to fight for their freedom as U.S. soldiers.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nJohn Laurens was born before America's independence \n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "No, the hypothesis is false - he was born in 1754 and the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4th, 1776.\nWhile the statement in the question is true, it doesn't provide enough information to prove the hypothesis. You need another piece of information: when did South Carolina become a state?\nSouth Carolina became the eighth state on May 23rd, 1788, which means John Laurens was indeed born before his state joined the Union.\nIt's possible to arrive at the correct answer without knowing the exact dates, if you know some other facts. For example, you may know that the Revolutionary War started in 1775, so since he fought in the war, he must have been born before then. That makes him older than five years old at the time of independence, which is sufficient to disprove the hypothesis.", "feedback": "Firstly, It's simple to deduce that the premise implies the hypothesis because we are given the year of John Lauren's birth, 1754. The America's Independence, as is common knowledge, is 1776. Therefore, John Lauren was born before America's independence. Secondly, The last sentence is simply wrong. If John Lauren's is older than 5 years old at the time of the Independence, he was born before the Independence. "}
{"id": 116, "dataset": "anli", "question": "Here is a premise:\nAl-Qaida-linked militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\n\nHere is a hypothesis:\nAl-Qaida militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\n\nDoes this premise imply the hypothesis? Please justify your answer:", "answer": "A hypothesis is an educated guess or proposal that can be tested by observation and experimentation.\nA premise is a statement that is assumed to be true for the sake of argument or discussion.\nSo a hypothesis must have at least one premise. And a premise may or may not be part of a hypothesis.\nIn your example, the first sentence (\"Al-Qaida-linked militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\") is a premise which forms the basis for the second sentence (\"Al-Qaida militants have carried out a series of suicide bombings targeting Western interests in Indonesia since 2002.\"), which is a hypothesis.", "feedback": "The answer does not follow the context logically. The correction is No, the premise implies the hypothesis that Al-Qaida militants or linked militants means essentially the same thing. "}
{"id": 117, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "If I were a snake, where would I go tempt people?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: white house\nOption 2: new mexico\nOption 3: beach\nOption 4: tropical forest\nOption 5: garden of eden\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If I were a snake, I would go to the White House to tempt people.\nThe White House is the home of the president of the United States. Many powerful and important people visit there. A snake could cause lots of trouble by tempting those people to do bad things.\nFor example, the snake could trick President Trump into starting a nuclear war. That would be very bad.", "feedback": "A snake can only tempt people in the biblical sense. It is common knowledge that snakes can't actually tempt anyone because they are only animals. Therefore, the correct answer should be the biblical Garden of Eden, because it is the only appropriate option where a snake would be able to tempt anyone."}
{"id": 118, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The liquid needed a place to be stored and not consumed easily, where did it need to go?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: jar\nOption 2: drinking glass\nOption 3: container\nOption 4: thermos\nOption 5: cup\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "For long term storage, you should use a jar because it seals tightly and keeps liquids fresh for longer than other options.\nFor short-term storage, you could use any of these containers. A thermos would be a good choice if you wanted to keep the liquid hot or cold for a while. A cup would be the best option if you were planning to drink the liquid right away.", "feedback": "The context states the liquid needs to be not consumed easily, so the last sentence of a cup as a storage would be inefficient. Although short term and long term options are nice to have, the answer does not pick one option. The correct option for storage to be not consumed easily would be container since it's used for holding a product enclosed."}
{"id": 119, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "There was no email reply, so what was the purpose of the follow up email?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: ignore\nOption 2: forward\nOption 3: ask\nOption 4: obesity\nOption 5: silence\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "The purpose of a follow up email is to get a response from the recipient. If there was no reply, it means that the first email wasn\u2019t effective enough or didn\u2019t provide all the information required by the recipient. Sending a second email is an attempt to address this issue and get a reaction.\nThere are several reasons why someone might not have replied to your initial email. They may have missed it among all the other emails they received, they may have been busy and forgot about it, they may have deliberately ignored it, or they may have had difficulty understanding what you were asking for. A follow up email gives them another chance to respond, and allows you to clarify your original message if necessary.\nIt\u2019s important to remember that people receive a lot of emails, and it\u2019s easy for yours to get lost in their inbox. You should therefore never assume that lack of response means lack of interest. A simple follow up email may be all it takes to get the ball rolling again.\nThere are a number of ways you could phrase your follow up email. Here are some examples:\n\nSubject: Follow up on [subject of previous email]\n\nDear [Recipient\u2019s Name],\n\nThis is a follow up to my email of [Date], regarding [Subject]. I understand that you may have been busy since then, but I wanted to check whether you had a chance to look over the documents I sent you.\nIf you have any questions or require further information, please let me know. Thank you for your attention to this matter.\n\nBest regards, [Your Name]\n\nOR\n\nSubject: Re: [Subject of previous email] \u2013 Any updates?\n\nHi [Recipient\u2019s Name],\n\nI hope this email finds you well. This is just a quick follow up to our discussion last week about [Subject].\nHave you had a chance to look over the documents I sent you? If you have any questions or need any more information from me, please let me know.\nThanks,\n[Your Name]", "feedback": "The answer doesn't specify an option and does not answer the question. The answer is ask, because the rest of the options don't make sense: the purpose of a follow-up email would never be to ignore or forward. Obesity and silence are simply nonsense options."}
{"id": 120, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where would you put a glass after drinking from it?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: ocean\nOption 2: water cooler\nOption 3: cabinet\nOption 4: dishwasher\nOption 5: dining room\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If there's a dishwasher available, I would put the glass in it. Otherwise, I would put it in the sink. Unless the sink is full of dirty dishes - then I would put it on the counter next to the sink. If there isn't any space on the counter, I would put it on the drying rack. If there aren't any clean dishes to use, I would put it on top of the fridge. If the fridge is too full, I would put it down on the floor (just kidding!).", "feedback": "The answer is concerned about the availability of a dishwasher, sink, drying rack or a fridge and does not provide the correct answer, a glass would be placed in a dishwasher according to the options provided."}
{"id": 121, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What can ignorance between groups cause?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: judge\nOption 2: fight\nOption 3: bliss\nOption 4: hostility\nOption 5: accidents\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "When there is ignorance between groups, it can cause all of the options you listed: \n* Judgement: If I don't know anything about group X, I might make assumptions about what they are like based on stereotypes or media portrayals. This could lead me to judge members of that group unfairly.\n* Fighting: If I feel negatively towards a group (based on my own prejudices or those of others), I am more likely to engage in violence against them.\n* Bliss: It is possible that lack of knowledge leads to positive feelings towards a group (for example, if I don't know that a particular group is disliked by others, then I may simply assume that everyone likes them). However, this is probably rare compared to negative feelings resulting from ignorance.\n* Hostility: Similar to fighting, if I feel negatively towards a group, I am more likely to behave hostilely towards them (by refusing to interact with them, for example)\n* Accidents: If I don't understand the customs and practices of another group, I may accidentally offend them or put myself in danger in their presence.", "feedback": "The answer went ahead to explain the option without giving an answer."}
{"id": 122, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "If you exercise intensely what can happen to your respiration?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: tiredness\nOption 2: shortness of breath\nOption 3: injury\nOption 4: fitness\nOption 5: thirst\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "When we exercise, our muscles need more energy, so they demand more oxygen from the blood. If we can't deliver enough oxygen to meet this increased demand, then we experience breathlessness (dyspnea). This may limit how intensely we can exercise.\nHowever, with training, our cardiovascular system becomes more efficient at transporting oxygen to the muscles, and our muscles become better at using it. So, although exercise initially causes dyspnea, over time it leads to improved fitness, which reduces dyspnea during exercise.", "feedback": "The answer does not pick the answer from the options given but the explanation given is correct."}
{"id": 123, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where would you find an auditorium without students?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: lights\nOption 2: city\nOption 3: theater\nOption 4: university campus\nOption 5: funeral\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "An auditorium is a large room designed for an audience to watch performances. It may be built as part of a larger performing arts center or as a stand-alone building.\nAn empty auditorium could exist if there are no scheduled events taking place. Additionally, it might be closed due to renovations or other reasons. Here are some scenarios where you might find an empty auditorium:\n\n* Before a performance begins, the audience enters the auditorium and takes their seats. After the performance ends, the audience leaves and the auditorium is once again empty.\n* A school's auditorium may be used for assemblies, graduation ceremonies, and other events that require a large space for students and faculty to gather. On weekends and during summer break, the auditorium would be empty.\n* Some cities have public auditoriums that host community events, concerts, plays, conferences, etc. Depending on the event schedule, it's possible that the auditorium would be empty at certain times.\n* Movie theaters often have auditorium-style seating for viewers. During matinee showings or on slow days, you might find an empty movie theater auditorium.\n* Universities typically have at least one auditorium for lectures, presentations, convocations, and other events. Like schools, universities tend to be less busy during holidays and summers, so the auditorium might be empty then.\n* Funerals sometimes take place in auditoriums if the deceased was very prominent in the community. Otherwise, funerals are usually held in churches or mortuaries instead.", "feedback": "The answer explains several options but does not give the right answer."}
{"id": 124, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The school dress code was strict, all girls had to wear a what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: pants\nOption 2: trousers\nOption 3: pant\nOption 4: long skirt\nOption 5: naked\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "The school dress code was strict, all girls had to wear a pants or trousers.\nPant/trouser is the correct term for what Americans usually call \"pants\". This includes both shorts and long trousers (US: pants). A skirt is a garment worn by women and some men, consisting of a piece of material (usually cloth) wrapped around the waist and hips, and usually extending downwards to the ankles.\nThe word \"skort\" may be used for a short skirt which has built-in shorts underneath; however this is uncommon.\nNo reputable school would require female students to go naked.", "feedback": "The answer mentions a \u201cskort\u201d, which is not an option provided in the context. Instead, the output should justify the answer using the options provided."}
{"id": 125, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What do people do when they feel a lot of excitement?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: eat\nOption 2: go somewhere\nOption 3: dance\nOption 4: express information\nOption 5: play hockey\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "When people feel a lot of excitement, they may eat, go somewhere, dance, express information or play hockey. Among these options, I think eating is the most common way for people to deal with excitement. For example, when people watch an exciting football match on TV, they often eat snacks such as chips and nuts. This is because eating can help relieve tension and make people relaxed. ", "feedback": "The answer does not answer the question correctly. The output mentions eating to relieve tension, which is not aligned with the context, and references facts that may or may not be true."}
{"id": 126, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "A human wants to go shopping in a dense urban area. Where might be a good place for a person to go shopping?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: detroit\nOption 2: elevator\nOption 3: workplace\nOption 4: downtown\nOption 5: mall\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Downtown or city center - This would be a good place to go shopping because it usually has many different stores within walking distance of each other, making it convenient to visit several in one trip.\nElevator - This is not a very good place to go shopping because elevators generally only go up and down, limiting where you can go.\nWorkplace - This is not a very good place to go shopping because most workplaces do not have stores inside of them. If there are any shops nearby, you might run into coworkers while shopping, which could be awkward if you buy something embarrassing.\nDowtown - This is the same as downtown/city center. See above for explanation.\nMall - A mall is a large building with multiple stores inside of it. Malls are designed for shopping, so you will likely find what you are looking for here. However, malls tend to be far away from cities, meaning that you will need to travel a long distance to reach one.", "feedback": "The reasoning in the answer is unclear as it lacks a final answer. The output should clearly identify the correct option. The correct answer should be downtown because it is the main commercial area of a city and it's dense"}
{"id": 127, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "How can an artist commemorate a horse forever.\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: hoof\nOption 2: kentucky derby\nOption 3: race track\nOption 4: painting\nOption 5: triple crown\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "To commemorate a horse forever, one could get its hoofprint cast in bronze or another durable material. This would be a great way to remember a beloved pet or a racehorse who won big races.\nAnother good option would be to have a painting done of the horse. A professional artist can capture the beauty and personality of the horse on canvas, making a unique and memorable keepsake.\nHorses are closely associated with the Kentucky Derby, so another option would be to get a souvenir from the derby that honors your horse. There are many products available featuring the iconic winner\u2019s garland of roses, which would make a beautiful memento.\nIf the horse was a champion racer, you could honor its achievements by getting a replica of its racing silks made. These colorful jackets worn by jockeys often feature distinctive designs, and they are a great way to celebrate a special horse.", "feedback": "The answer does not have one single answer from the options but rather decides to give extra options"}
{"id": 128, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The kids were living big in the big city, the went to a nightclub on the lower east side of where?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: drink and dance\nOption 2: building\nOption 3: toronto\nOption 4: manhattan\nOption 5: downtown area\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the solution:\nThe kids were living big in the big city, they went to a nightclub on the lower east side of Manhattan.\nOption 1: drink and dance\nThis option describes what people do at a nightclub, but does not provide any location information.\nOption 2: building\nA nightclub is not usually located inside a building - it is typically found in an urban area with other businesses and residences nearby.\nOption 3: toronto\nToronto is a Canadian city, not a U.S. city. The question states that the story takes place in a \"big city\" in the United States.\nOption 4: manhattan\nManhattan is an island in New York City, and contains many neighborhoods, including the Lower East Side where the nightclub was located.\nOption 5: downtown area\nWhile \"downtown\" can refer to the central business district of a city, it does not specify which city, and it could be anywhere in the world. \"Lower East Side\" specifies a particular neighborhood within a city.", "feedback": "The answer went ahead to explain several options but does not provide an answer."}
{"id": 129, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The women decided it was time to talk about the issue, they were tired of staying and what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: keeping quiet\nOption 2: being silent\nOption 3: sit silently\nOption 4: magazine\nOption 5: think of to say\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "It's time to talk about the issue. We can't keep quiet any longer.", "feedback": "The answer gives a phrase but does not mention the correct answer from the options given."}
{"id": 130, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What do you put on the surface covered with linoleum?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: kitchen floor\nOption 2: house\nOption 3: furniture\nOption 4: mobile home\nOption 5: living room\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Linoleum is an extremely durable material that can be used for both residential and commercial applications. It\u2019s commonly found on kitchen floors, but it also works well in bathrooms, laundry rooms, mudrooms, basements, and entryways.\n\nProperly maintained linoleum will last anywhere between 20-40 years. However, if your linoleum has begun to look dull or scratched, you might consider refinishing it instead of replacing it altogether. Here\u2019s how:\n\n## Prepare the surface\n\n1. Sweep and mop the floor. Before beginning any type of refinishing project, it\u2019s important to start with a clean slate (or floor). Use a broom to sweep up any loose dust or debris. Then, mop the entire area using hot water and a good quality floor cleaner. Allow the floor to dry completely. If you don\u2019t allow the floor to dry thoroughly, the sealer won\u2019t adhere properly.\n2. Remove any existing wax or finish. You should always remove any previous coatings before applying a fresh layer of finish. Otherwise, the new coating won\u2019t adhere correctly, and it will eventually peel up and leave behind a sticky residue. There are several ways to remove old floor finishes including sanding, scraping, and chemical strippers. Choose whichever method is most practical given the amount of time and money you\u2019re willing to spend. Once you\u2019ve removed the old finish, wash the floor again with soap and water. Allow it to dry completely.\n3. Sand the floor lightly with fine-grit sandpaper. Using light pressure, run the sandpaper over the entire floor until it becomes smooth to the touch. This process helps create a rough texture on the linoleum, giving the sealant something to grab onto. Don\u2019t use too much force while sanding, though; otherwise, you could damage the underlying surface. After sanding, vacuum up the dust and rinse the floor with warm water. Dry the floor completely before proceeding.\n4. Prime the floor with a latex concrete primer. Most paint stores sell special primers designed specifically for concrete surfaces. Follow the instructions on the label and apply a thin coat of primer to the floor using a roller brush or paint pad applicator. Let the primer", "feedback": "While the answer gave explanations, there wasn't a conclusive answer."}
{"id": 131, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where would you need a ladder to eat?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: garage\nOption 2: hardware store\nOption 3: apple orchard\nOption 4: couch\nOption 5: climbing to higher level\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If you were very short, you might need to use a ladder to reach food on a high shelf in your garage, hardware store or other similar building.\nIf you were climbing an apple tree, you would also need a ladder.\nYou could sit on your couch and use a step stool to reach food on a high shelf, but you probably wouldn\u2019t need to use a ladder.\nIt\u2019s unlikely you would need to climb up a ladder to get to a higher level. You would be more likely to take the stairs or elevator.", "feedback": "The answer explains two options(garage and apple orchard) as possible answers but does not choose the right option between the two as require by the context."}
{"id": 132, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What would someone be if he or she is not normal?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: unconventional\nOption 2: orthodox\nOption 3: ill\nOption 4: reverse\nOption 5: tangential\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If someone is not normal, it means they are different from the norm. The \"norm\" refers to what is considered usual or typical.\nTherefore, some possible ways of expressing that someone is not normal include:\n\n* abnormal\n* unusual\n* atypical\n* uncommon\n* nonstandard\n* deviant\n\nHere are some example sentences using these words:\n\n* His behavior was so abnormal that we called the police.\n* That is an unusually large dog.\n* Her attitude toward money is quite atypical; she doesn't care much about it.\n* His political views are uncommon among people his age.\n* This type of weather is not common in this region.\n* He has a very nonstandard sense of humor.\n* She is considered a social deviant because her behaviors are so unlike those of most people.", "feedback": "The answer gives explanation but does not give a conclusive answer."}
{"id": 133, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "When wildlife reproduce we often refer to what comes out as what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: raise children\nOption 2: have children\nOption 3: photo copy\nOption 4: offspring\nOption 5: accidently got pregnant somehow\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "The correct option is 4: offspring.\nHere's why:\nWhile \"raise children\" and \"have children\" may seem like reasonable options at first glance, neither one is really accurate when applied to non-human animals. Humans are unique (so far as we know) in that our young are helpless for an extended period after birth, during which time they must be cared for by adults. No other species has this same characteristic; all other animals are able to care for themselves almost immediately after being born/hatched/etc., or else their parents would never survive long enough to pass on their genes.\nThe word \"offspring\", on the other hand, simply refers to any young produced by reproduction. It implies no particular level of parental involvement beyond conception and gestation (if applicable). An animal's offspring may be raised by its parents, by another member of its species, or not at all; the term does not specify.", "feedback": "The first paragraph of the answer's output talks about human children and their particular characteristics which is not part of the context and irrelevant to answering the question."}
{"id": 134, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Sometimes a person has a fear of water or a dislike of being wet, it is still important to make sure they are having a bath why?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: flooding\nOption 2: drowning\nOption 3: wet skin\nOption 4: get wet\nOption 5: rash\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "It is important to make sure that a person has a bath even if they are afraid of water/dislike being wet because it is essential for their hygiene and general wellbeing. If someone doesn't have regular baths, they will get very dirty and this can lead to skin problems such as rashes or infections. Also, washing regularly helps keep your hair clean and prevents it from getting matted or tangled.\nAlthough some people may find it unpleasant, it is not dangerous to be wet or to drown in fresh water. Being submerged in water does not automatically mean you will drown - you have to breathe in water for it to cause damage. So long as somebody is able to hold their breath or breathe out while underwater, there is no risk of drowning. However, it is possible to fall into water and panic, which could result in exhaustion or hypothermia. This is why it is important to supervise young children around water, but adults who are fearful of water can bathe safely alone as long as they remain calm.", "feedback": "The answer gives an explanation but does not arrive to a final answer."}
{"id": 135, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What is likely to happen immediately a rash killing?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: go to the store\nOption 2: going to jail\nOption 3: being imprisoned\nOption 4: feeling of guilt\nOption 5: no longer live\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "If someone commits a rash killing, they will be arrested and charged with murder. Depending on the circumstances (e.g., premeditation, whether it was a hate crime, etc.), the person may plead guilty or not guilty. If they plead guilty, then they will likely receive a reduced sentence; if they plead not guilty, then there will be a trial wherein the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. If found guilty, the punishment may range from life imprisonment without parole to the death penalty in some states. \nIn addition to criminal charges, the person may face civil litigation by the family of the victim(s) for wrongful death.", "feedback": "The answer is missing the step in reasoning that the context is asking for what will happen \"immediately\" after a killing. A person will not be arrested and charge immediately but they may immediately feel guilt. The answer also does not go through other options besides option 2 and 3 ignoring the other options."}
{"id": 136, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where could you see a sloth that only exists in your head?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: picture book\nOption 2: bad dream\nOption 3: another place\nOption 4: universe\nOption 5: rainforest\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "The sloth that only exists in my head can be seen in the rainforest. This is because sloths are found in tropical rainforests. They spend most of their lives hanging upside down from trees.", "feedback": "The answer contradicts with commons sense that if the sloth only exists in your head, because rainforests are not figments of our imagination but exist in real life, bad dream is the only correct answer out of these options. "}
{"id": 137, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "With four legs dogs can do what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: attack\nOption 2: run fast\nOption 3: fleas\nOption 4: defend\nOption 5: eat\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Dogs have four legs, which allow them to run very fast. They use their speed to chase and catch prey, as well as to escape from predators. Some dogs, such as greyhounds, are bred for their speed.\nDogs also use their strong legs to defend themselves and their humans if threatened. Dogs will often stand tall and put their shoulders back to make themselves look bigger and more intimidating. If this doesn\u2019t work, they will try to knock the other animal over by charging at it.\nSome breeds of dog were originally used to hunt animals in packs. These dogs still have the instinct to chase and kill small animals, so should always be kept on a leash in public places.", "feedback": "The context states to choose the correct answer not to choose all that apply. The answer misunderstands that and makes up convoluted answers to a simple question: \"Dogs also use their strong legs to defend themselves and their humans if threatened. \" \n\nThe answer's first sentence is correct and should've been the answer to the question. The correct answer is run fast and must be justified with an explanation."}
{"id": 138, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The neighborhood had a great sense of community, there was always a crowd at the landing of the what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: stairwell\nOption 2: arena\nOption 3: ocean\nOption 4: airport\nOption 5: apartment building\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "I think the correct option is 1 (stairwell).\n\nThere are several reasons why I think this is the case:\nFirst, a \"landing\" usually refers to a platform between flights of stairs or an elevator. While an arena might also have landings, it wouldn't be described as having a landing in the way that a stairwell would be.\nSecond, the phrase \"at the landing\" suggests that people were gathering in one specific place, which is more consistent with a stairwell than any of the other options. People using an airport, ocean, or apartment building would not typically congregate in a single location within those spaces. In an arena, people might gather at the entrance, but they would not be described as being \"at the landing\".\nThird, the description of the neighborhood as having a great sense of community supports the idea that people were coming together in a shared space. This is most likely to occur in a public area such as a stairwell, rather than a private area like an apartment building.", "feedback": "The answer states that the people would most likely come together in a shared space such as a stairwell. The context, however, mentions that there was a crowd. A crowd usually denotes a larger number of people who would not choose a stairwell to congregate. "}
{"id": 139, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "A quarter of it was twenty five pounds, so the whole was what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: school year\nOption 2: hundredweight\nOption 3: upper\nOption 4: century\nOption 5: hour\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Here is the solution step by step:\n\nA quarter of 25 pounds is 6.25 pounds.\nTwenty five pounds times four is 100 pounds.\nTherefore, the whole amount is 100 pounds.", "feedback": "The first sentence in the answer is incorrect. 25 pounds is explained in the context as a quarter of the whole so calculating a quarter of 25 pounds is an incorrect step. The 2nd and 3rd sentences are correct and reach the right conclusion, 25 pounds x4 (since there are 4 quarters in a whole), = 100 pounds."}
{"id": 140, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Before buying a house, what should I look for concerning my job?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: make home\nOption 2: security\nOption 3: measureing distances\nOption 4: examining poorch\nOption 5: make money\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Before buying a house, it's important to consider how the location of your new home will affect your commute to work. A long commute can negatively impact your quality of life, so you want to make sure that you choose a home that is relatively close to your place of employment. Additionally, you should also take into account potential future changes to your job. For example, if there is a possibility that you might need to travel more for work, you would want to choose a home that allows you to easily access major roads and highways. Another factor to consider is whether or not your company plans to move to a new location in the near future. If this is the case, you may want to think twice about purchasing a home that is very close to your current office, as your commute could significantly increase in the next few years. Ultimately, the decision is yours to make, but I recommend evaluating how your new home will affect your commute to work before finalizing the purchase.", "feedback": "After giving an explanation, the answer does not provide an answer."}
{"id": 141, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "The person was looking for the bus arrival time, what did he do with the station schedule?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: read text\nOption 2: cross street\nOption 3: enjoy learning\nOption 4: throw away\nOption 5: play dumb\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "The person may read the text on the schedule to get an overview of when buses arrive at the station. However, since he was looking for the arrival time of a specific bus, it is likely that he skimmed through the text quickly and looked for the relevant information only.\nHe may have crossed the street if the bus stop was on the opposite side of the street.\nIt is unlikely that he enjoyed reading the schedule since most transit schedules contain a lot of technical information which is hard to understand for non-experts.\nIt is very unlikely that he threw away the schedule since most people tend to hold onto useful information, especially if it was obtained with effort.\nPlaying dumb is extremely unlikely since this would require him to pretend that he does not know the answer to a question even though he actually knows it.", "feedback": "The answer mentions \"enjoying reading the schedule\", the option 3 however is not enjoy reading but enjoy learning. "}
{"id": 142, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Where can the legs of a stool be built?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: jail\nOption 2: internet cafe\nOption 3: blacksmith's shop\nOption 4: building\nOption 5: bar\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "A stool can be built using wood, metal or plastic. Therefore, the legs of a stool could be built in a place where those materials are available and tools for shaping them are available too.\nA jail might have steel bars which could be melted down and reused to make the legs of a stool, but it seems unlikely that they would allow prisoners to do this. An internet cafe probably doesn't have any raw materials like metal or wood, so it wouldn't be possible to build anything there. A blacksmith's shop definitely has iron and tools for working it, so that is a good choice. A building site might have timber and tools for cutting and shaping it, so that is also a good choice. And finally, a bar might have wooden chairs which could be broken apart and used as material to make new legs for a stool, and patrons of the bar might have useful tools such as hammers which could be borrowed. However, making a stool in a bar would likely annoy the other customers, so it is not the best choice.\nSo the best places to build the legs of a stool are a blacksmith's shop and a building site.", "feedback": "The answer after giving an explanation goes ahead and chooses two options instead of one."}
{"id": 143, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "Clean linen was important in John's workplace Where might John work?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: hospital\nOption 2: daycare\nOption 3: dresser drawers\nOption 4: at hotel\nOption 5: cabinet\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Since John's workplace emphasizes cleanliness, it must be a hospital.", "feedback": "The answer does not explain why clean linen are important. Does not use the word linen but instead cleanliness which is too broad. Doesn't justify hospital with an explanation. Correct answer is hospital because people are ill and if linens are not clean, infection can spread fast in a hospital. "}
{"id": 144, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What might john order at an indian resturant on top of the space needle?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: large city\nOption 2: seattle\nOption 3: curry\nOption 4: clothing\nOption 5: reservation\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "As it is an Indian restaurant on top of the Space Needle in Seattle, he would probably order a large curry with naan bread and a glass of water. He might make a reservation if he planned ahead, or just go there at night after sightseeing.\nOption 1 is too general; it could be any city in the world.\nOption 2 is correct because it specifies the location as Seattle.\nOption 3 is tempting, but he could order curry anywhere; this doesn\u2019t specify where he is ordering it from.\nOption 4 makes no sense; clothing is not something you order at a restaurant.\nOption 5 is possible, but not necessary since restaurants often take walk-ins.", "feedback": "Option 3 in the answer states he could order curry from anywhere but we know from the context John is ordering at an Indian restaurant on top of the Space Needle in Seattle. Option 3 is the only correct answer because large city, Seattle, clothing, and reservation are not food orders/dishes. "}
{"id": 145, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "While some people prefer to lie, others do prefer to bluntly what?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: amount to nothing\nOption 2: talk louder\nOption 3: talking loudly\nOption 4: talk to each other\nOption 5: state facts\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Some people prefer to bluntly state facts.\nI think this is the correct answer because if someone prefers to lie then they wouldn't necessarily want to say things that are true, therefore they would choose not to \"bluntly state facts\".\nSome people may talk louder when trying to convince others of something, but this doesn't mean they are stating facts. They could be shouting opinions or lies.\nTalking loudly and talking to each other aren't really ways of communicating; they just describe how somebody might do it.\nStating facts isn't an action, either - it's what you do with the facts that matters. You could state them quietly, angrily, sadly, etc.\nTherefore, I believe the best option is to \"bluntly state facts.\"", "feedback": "The answer is correct until the last 3 sentences. Stating facts is an action just like talking is. Since the context starts by saying while some people prefer to lie, the only logical choice is the opposite of that which is option 5, others do prefer to bluntly state facts. "}
{"id": 146, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What type of corn structure would contain many passageways?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: jungle\nOption 2: house\nOption 3: maze\nOption 4: labyrinth\nOption 5: hotel\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "A maze has many dead ends and is meant to be difficult to navigate. A labyrinth, on the other hand, has a single path that twists and turns but always leads to the center. So, if you wanted to create a corn structure with lots of passageways, you would build a large labyrinth (not a maze).", "feedback": "A labyrinth is not made of corn structures so the answer's logic that a corn structure with lots of passage ways is a labyrinth is false. The correct answer would be: A maze is made up of corn plantations with many passageways and a corn maze is the most common in occurrence. Corn structures do not exist in a jungle, nor house, nor labyrinth, nor hotel. "}
{"id": 147, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What do all people have except sociopaths?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: cheeks\nOption 2: parents\nOption 3: common sense\nOption 4: muscles\nOption 5: feelings\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "All people have parents, though some people are orphans and were raised by non-parental guardians.\nAll people have feelings, though some people may be emotionally numb due to trauma or mental illness.\nAll people have common sense, though some people may be cognitively impaed and lack the capacity for reasoning.\nAll people have muscles, though some people may have physical disabilities that prevent them from using their muscles normally.\nOnly humans have cheeks. Other primates have facial structures similar to our cheeks, but they are actually fat pads rather than distinct muscles.", "feedback": "The answer does not provide an answer at the end of the explanation."}
{"id": 148, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "A human wants to submerge himself in water, what should he use?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: whirlpool bath\nOption 2: coffee cup\nOption 3: cup\nOption 4: soft drink\nOption 5: puddle\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "To fully submerge himself in water, the human should use either a whirlpool bath, a swimming pool, a lake, an ocean, or any other large body of water. A coffee cup, a drinking cup, a soft drink, or a puddle do not contain enough water to fully submerge a human.", "feedback": "The answer gives an explanation but does not give an answer at the end."}
{"id": 149, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "I have a migraine and am finding information, what is my problem?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: increased knowledge\nOption 2: knowing more\nOption 3: questions\nOption 4: headaches\nOption 5: understanding of\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "Option 1 is not the correct answer because although I may gain more knowledge about migraines by researching them, this does not mean that my current problem (a migraine) will be solved.\nOption 2 is also not correct as knowing more about something doesn\u2019t necessarily imply any benefit. For example, I could know more about how nuclear weapons work but that doesn\u2019t help me survive a nuclear apocalypse. Similarly, knowing more about migraines won\u2019t help me get rid of my migraine.\nOption 3 is also incorrect as merely asking questions doesn\u2019t solve problems - you have to find answers too! Although asking questions is an important part of learning, it alone won\u2019t help me with my migraine.\nThat leaves option 4 as the correct answer. By researching migraines, I will learn more about their symptoms, causes, and treatments. Armed with this new information, I can better manage my migraines and hopefully reduce their frequency and severity.", "feedback": "The answer does not give a clear answer after the explanation."}
{"id": 150, "dataset": "ECQA", "question": "What would you need if you want to smoke?\n\nHere are the options:\nOption 1: you're stupid\nOption 2: kill yourself\nOption 3: roll joint\nOption 4: cigarette\nOption 5: lighter fluid.\n\nPlease choose the correct option and justify your choice:", "answer": "I'd need a cigarette and a lighter. Cigarettes contain nicotine, which is addictive but doesn't really do much else; it just makes you want more nicotine. You don't actually need nicotine to smoke, though -- you could smoke non-nicotine c
gitextract_9xyx2n90/
├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
├── CONTRIBUTING.md
├── LICENSE
├── README.md
├── data/
│ ├── human_data_for_model.jsonl
│ └── human_data_raw.jsonl
├── docs/
│ ├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
│ └── CONTRIBUTING.md
└── notebook/
└── process_human_data.ipynb
Condensed preview — 9 files, each showing path, character count, and a content snippet. Download the .json file or copy for the full structured content (4,271K chars).
[
{
"path": "CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md",
"chars": 3541,
"preview": "# Code of Conduct\n\n## Our Pledge\n\nIn the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as\ncontributors and"
},
{
"path": "CONTRIBUTING.md",
"chars": 1250,
"preview": "# Contributing to Shepherd\nWe want to make contributing to this project as easy and transparent as\npossible.\n\n## Pull Re"
},
{
"path": "LICENSE",
"chars": 19328,
"preview": "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International\n\n=======================================================================\n\nCr"
},
{
"path": "README.md",
"chars": 3220,
"preview": "# Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generation\n\nTianlu Wang*, Ping Yu*, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan<sup>+</sup>, Sean O'Brien"
},
{
"path": "data/human_data_for_model.jsonl",
"chars": 1351588,
"preview": "{\"id\": 0, \"dataset\": \"GSM8K\", \"question\": \"Jolene and Phil have four children, each with the same birthday. They gave b"
},
{
"path": "data/human_data_raw.jsonl",
"chars": 2687438,
"preview": "{\"id\": 0, \"dataset\": \"GSM8K\", \"latestLabel\": {\"jsonResponse\": {\"CLASSIFICATION_JOB_0\": {\"categories\": [{\"confidence\": 10"
},
{
"path": "docs/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md",
"chars": 3536,
"preview": "# Code of Conduct\n\n## Our Pledge\n\nIn the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as\ncontributors and"
},
{
"path": "docs/CONTRIBUTING.md",
"chars": 1446,
"preview": "# Contributing to __________\nWe want to make contributing to this project as easy and transparent as\npossible.\n\n## Our D"
},
{
"path": "notebook/process_human_data.ipynb",
"chars": 21254,
"preview": "{\n \"cells\": [\n {\n \"cell_type\": \"code\",\n \"execution_count\": null,\n \"metadata\": {},\n \"outputs\": [],\n \"source\": "
}
]
About this extraction
This page contains the full source code of the facebookresearch/Shepherd GitHub repository, extracted and formatted as plain text for AI agents and large language models (LLMs). The extraction includes 9 files (3.9 MB), approximately 1.0M tokens. Use this with OpenClaw, Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf, or any other AI tool that accepts text input. You can copy the full output to your clipboard or download it as a .txt file.
Extracted by GitExtract — free GitHub repo to text converter for AI. Built by Nikandr Surkov.